In re P., B. & W. R. R. Co.

Superior Court of Delaware

In re P., B. & W. R. R. Co.

105 A. 676, 30 Del. 258, 7 Boyce 258, 1919 Del. LEXIS 19

CourtSuperior Court of Delaware

DecidedFebruary 12, 1919

DocketAction on the case No. 75

StatusPublished

This text of 105 A. 676 (In re P., B. & W. R. R. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re P., B. & W. R. R. Co., 105 A. 676, 30 Del. 258, 7 Boyce 258, 1919 Del. LEXIS 19 (Del. Ct. App. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

Heisel, J:

[1, 2] Under the circumstances presented the court is of the opinion that a continuance should be granted. The affidavit of the physician as to the physical condition of the witness, and that he, the physician, was also too ill to appear for examination on the stand is sufficient to meet the requirements for a continuance. There is nothing out of the usual order in the application, excepting as to the number of witnesses present from [260]*260out of the state. We will continue the case but decline to impose terms.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Heisel, J:

[1, 2] Under the circumstances presented the court is of the opinion that a continuance should be granted. The affidavit of the physician as to the physical condition of the witness, and that he, the physician, was also too ill to appear for examination on the stand is sufficient to meet the requirements for a continuance. There is nothing out of the usual order in the application, excepting as to the number of witnesses present from [260]*260out of the state. We will continue the case but decline to impose terms.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

105 A. 676, 30 Del. 258, 7 Boyce 258, 1919 Del. LEXIS 19, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-p-b-w-r-r-co-delsuperct-1919.