in Re: Owen T. Gordy
This text of in Re: Owen T. Gordy (in Re: Owen T. Gordy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued June 27, 2002
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
____________
NO. 01-02-00611-CV
IN RE OWEN T. GORDY, Relator
Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus
O P I N I O N
Relator, Owen T. Gordy, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus complaining that Judge Sandel (1) has failed to enforce the rules of discovery in responding to relator's request for production sent on May 15, 2002.
Relator had previously appealed the final judgment in trial court cause no. 20,429-C. The appeal was assigned to the Court of Appeals for the Fourteenth District of Texas at Houston. The Fourteenth Court disposed of the appeal in an opinion issued on December 14, 2000. Mandate issued on March 8, 2001.
Relator has not provided this Court with any record of what he has filed in the trial court. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.3(j)(1). Although relator states he has sent a copy of the petition for writ of mandamus to Judge Sandel, he has not served the defendants in the trial court with a copy of the petition for writ of mandamus. See Tex. R. App. P. 9.5, 52.2.
We deny the petition for writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Mirabal, Taft, and Alcala.
Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.
1.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Owen T. Gordy, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-owen-t-gordy-texapp-2002.