Home/Ninth Circuit/In Re Owen

In Re Owen

42 F.3d 1401, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 39506
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedDecember 6, 1994
Docket93-15907
StatusPublished
Cited by33 cases

This text of 42 F.3d 1401 (In Re Owen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Owen, 42 F.3d 1401, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 39506 (9th Cir. 1994).

Opinion

42 F.3d 1401
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

In re Kenneth OWEN; Margaret Owen, Debtors.
UNITED STATES of America; Department of Treasury, Internal
Revenue Service, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee,
v.
Kenneth OWEN and Margaret Owen, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant.

Nos. 93-15907, 93-15920.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Nov. 14, 1994.
Decided Dec. 6, 1994.

Before: ALARCON and HALL, Circuit Judges, and KING,* District Judge.

MEMORANDUM**

For the reasons set forth in the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel's unpublished opinion, we AFFIRM.

*

Honorable Samuel P. King, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Hawaii, sitting by designation

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

(PC) Penton v. Hubard
E.D. California, 2019
Glassley v. Commissioner
1996 T.C. Memo. 206 (U.S. Tax Court, 1996)
The Permanent Charities Committee of the Entertainment Industries v. Rh Group, Inc., and Phillip J. Horowitz
42 F.3d 1401 (Ninth Circuit, 1994)
Eddy M. Pineda Elizabeth Pineda, Individually and in Their Capacity as Parents and Guardians of Jeshua A. Pineda v. United States
42 F.3d 1401 (Ninth Circuit, 1994)
Christine Rodkey v. Capitol American Life Insurance Co.
42 F.3d 1401 (Ninth Circuit, 1994)
Thomas A. Safstrom Lana G. Safstrom v. Commissioner Internal Revenue Service
42 F.3d 1401 (Ninth Circuit, 1994)
Elizabeth Quintana v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
42 F.3d 1401 (Ninth Circuit, 1994)
Manuel J. Perez v. Donna E. Shalala, Secretary of Health and Human Services
42 F.3d 1401 (Ninth Circuit, 1994)
Jorge L. Ortiz v. County of Orange M. Arellano M. Mech Rose Mary Reyes-Hatch
42 F.3d 1401 (Ninth Circuit, 1994)
Gary Pilon v. Taylor Braslow Gary L. Banning Ruben Cedeno Chase Riveland
42 F.3d 1401 (Ninth Circuit, 1994)
Roberts v. Heim
42 F.3d 1401 (Ninth Circuit, 1994)
James E. Morgan v. Charles D. Marshall, Warden
42 F.3d 1401 (Ninth Circuit, 1994)
Carl E. Perkins v. Pelican Bay State Prison, and Charles D. Marshall
42 F.3d 1401 (Ninth Circuit, 1994)
Nancy Ann Ruff, and B. Benedict Waters v. Charles Young, Norman Eugene Wright, Paul P. Townsend, Fred Takemiya, Wanda Soukup, Don Smith, Susan Von Seeburg, Sandra Rich, Hagenbaugh & Murphy, Meredith A. Musicant Gail Cowling, William Cormier, Barbara Corona-Sutton, Peter Blackman, Charles Oakley, John Sicard, and Herman Tiano
42 F.3d 1401 (Ninth Circuit, 1994)
Jose L. Admiral Rossell v. Neil Emore Lisa Enfield
42 F.3d 1401 (Ninth Circuit, 1994)
Clarence E. Pitts v. Michael Nakamura, Chief Honolulu Police Department
42 F.3d 1401 (Ninth Circuit, 1994)
Eddie A. Perez v. K.W. Prunty, Chief Deputy Warden
42 F.3d 1401 (Ninth Circuit, 1994)
Rick Edward May v. Manfred F. Maass, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary
42 F.3d 1401 (Ninth Circuit, 1994)
Parmjit Nijjar v. Peterbilt Motors Company, a Division of Paccar, Inc., and Does I-X
42 F.3d 1401 (Ninth Circuit, 1994)
Minor Moody v. Joe Martinez
42 F.3d 1401 (Ninth Circuit, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
42 F.3d 1401, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 39506, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-owen-ca9-1994.