_,. l_/Wc/)i^_*4/L_^^ PTKidl* inttmse feurCv rises. Her office is hcahd attint Hum's County Criminal Just-let Ce/ikr, IZo\ Franklin/1't7tt\ floor. Houston T**Al 7700£, -_
_ _ ksfondent/Susan Srou/n/In contemptofcourtand tampering with apenJlnj official proceeding^ is mJjftiyJkl. fu/fi'llmj lr\tr ministerial iutyh ansytr Relator'* properly submitted notionsjparticularly l\ls petitions and applications for writof habeas corpus -filed individually ii\ these ioar (M) rases, ,. I l . l i l , . - . M . --
-Pm/l3- STATEMENT OF JUKTStZCTZOI
/Zpl/Thr.fi/enllt PentoA Thomson^invokes' thejurisdiction of the first Court of Appeals kpcatisr Ae has no other plain/SpitdyJni adtau<&t re.mp.dy Perform its ministerial dufj/ r Al\k n/rh lta\/e void ielaforb properly filed documents,-fkerehy enaUinj Relaford freedom of speech,
fluffs msEtfTEf)
Relator Owrlile Denton Thompson's necessary lejal rijlnfiv he heard, gnd gnd that of UU due process of law 'have effectively been denied hitn hccausc of' Faint I ' Ineffective and Xnsa-fficienf Counself*4nd
feint3E' fotMfiderifSatan Bran's Refusal to Arp\jer ^elatir]s Properly Filed Remedies.
%_1 STfrrmerfF of facts
Feint H Ineffective and Insufficient CnunseI
Ccurt-appoiriwi attorney/Tomy UFon^ from the onset did knowingly and purposefully nlsrtppzseit falator/Querlllt fiprifon~Fko*p
JR that I
a, fry and through Uls actions or lack -thereof/Tn*>y Ufon helped to keep Relator unfairly TtmM to custody whlk the 5tate conducts an w-jolna investigation oftie neyj allegation, •It. \ lil. J I, i . ,. r\ I ../.
of tihich tz> t^/s day exist no physical evidence or material facts just mere accusation su^pportid by confllctlnj circumstantial/^ur^ay testimony,
h.Tommy UPon jid attempt to mai\lpudatt klator Jntt unlawfully comparing evidence against klm<>eff, t . , \ t . • . . . ' i . i i .1
which Is evidenced ly hy the numberjf paragraph enhancement tron the ortjlnal cent/olided Conplaintpmented on AW ft/toS to that ^hlch was presented mAugust ft/VOlS after the i uly£7,26lS Consalfaton appearance Supposedly for all foarCLi) cases.
C, Hatvr u/as ralobed nfdue process from the onset atthe new allegation; of dnlck Tommy UFw possessing clear full kmaikdge helped ficlUfdZ/M^du^sJ.
(t) Relator was never accorded aprobahle ctqse hearing at the commencepetit of'tht Dew allegation brought M*y l^/ZOl^^cr was he e\Jtr formally arraigned', to Qlgrlfy/ no presinftion of the new charge wa.s ever r^ak before <3 magistrate hy electronic broadcastsystem or in-person f
_J_ _ . i.ulklato.r-W-4S^fieV-e-(l^-Ca^
dLr\a,rch iA.ljDfr atPn>.-Tr^l Hearing In open Court.Tn^^y Uhn \ld acknowledge without xedr3SsJiespj>AttitJiixsAn-&a.w — ** the time hem offered ihitddy/then at Suppression Hearing fclatcr would have to enter into aplea /jpauift Jth fie PA LPistrlct Money! f Respondent were to side h/lth State at~ Said Suppression Hearing,
e>,June 1/1Q& at scheduled Suppression Hearing and subsequentJury TrUI,
ll)Jx>.fainV-LTAFoA-didi^uspsna^iihfjjt^ustcAUS^ Relater's right toJuie process of Ui^u.nJiotk oF these necessary proceedings shnJoa Insufficient overriding necessity for such as being jtke^eh/J^S£_b,rMgbt^usJcJ^^ with no indlctment/-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
IH THE COURT OF APPEALS FORTH? FIRST Jjl Itf//T) Q^M-fiP.
c^t No. m$qv\ mww MMSJ W 05 2015 \%U£3 chhistopHbr
Xn rey Overt Ik Anton Thompson, Relator, V,
Susan &roWh ± Respondent,
ES0085-01-07 IVENJ3TY'OF ftfcTXES
Pi'ttrict C»ur1~ of Appalsi 30! Fani'n 5frertjHcusibh.TeXA<> 7700£
_,. l_/Wc/)i^_*4/L_^^ PTKidl* inttmse feurCv rises. Her office is hcahd attint Hum's County Criminal Just-let Ce/ikr, IZo\ Franklin/1't7tt\ floor. Houston T**Al 7700£, -_
_ _ ksfondent/Susan Srou/n/In contemptofcourtand tampering with apenJlnj official proceeding^ is mJjftiyJkl. fu/fi'llmj lr\tr ministerial iutyh ansytr Relator'* properly submitted notionsjparticularly l\ls petitions and applications for writof habeas corpus -filed individually ii\ these ioar (M) rases, ,. I l . l i l , . - . M . --
-Pm/l3- STATEMENT OF JUKTStZCTZOI
/Zpl/Thr.fi/enllt PentoA Thomson^invokes' thejurisdiction of the first Court of Appeals kpcatisr Ae has no other plain/SpitdyJni adtau<&t re.mp.dy Perform its ministerial dufj/ r Al\k n/rh lta\/e void ielaforb properly filed documents,-fkerehy enaUinj Relaford freedom of speech,
fluffs msEtfTEf)
Relator Owrlile Denton Thompson's necessary lejal rijlnfiv he heard, gnd gnd that of UU due process of law 'have effectively been denied hitn hccausc of' Faint I ' Ineffective and Xnsa-fficienf Counself*4nd
feint3E' fotMfiderifSatan Bran's Refusal to Arp\jer ^elatir]s Properly Filed Remedies.
%_1 STfrrmerfF of facts
Feint H Ineffective and Insufficient CnunseI
Ccurt-appoiriwi attorney/Tomy UFon^ from the onset did knowingly and purposefully nlsrtppzseit falator/Querlllt fiprifon~Fko*p
JR that I
a, fry and through Uls actions or lack -thereof/Tn*>y Ufon helped to keep Relator unfairly TtmM to custody whlk the 5tate conducts an w-jolna investigation oftie neyj allegation, •It. \ lil. J I, i . ,. r\ I ../.
of tihich tz> t^/s day exist no physical evidence or material facts just mere accusation su^pportid by confllctlnj circumstantial/^ur^ay testimony,
h.Tommy UPon jid attempt to mai\lpudatt klator Jntt unlawfully comparing evidence against klm<>eff, t . , \ t . • . . . ' i . i i .1
which Is evidenced ly hy the numberjf paragraph enhancement tron the ortjlnal cent/olided Conplaintpmented on AW ft/toS to that ^hlch was presented mAugust ft/VOlS after the i uly£7,26lS Consalfaton appearance Supposedly for all foarCLi) cases.
C, Hatvr u/as ralobed nfdue process from the onset atthe new allegation; of dnlck Tommy UFw possessing clear full kmaikdge helped ficlUfdZ/M^du^sJ.
(t) Relator was never accorded aprobahle ctqse hearing at the commencepetit of'tht Dew allegation brought M*y l^/ZOl^^cr was he e\Jtr formally arraigned', to Qlgrlfy/ no presinftion of the new charge wa.s ever r^ak before <3 magistrate hy electronic broadcastsystem or in-person f
_J_ _ . i.ulklato.r-W-4S^fieV-e-(l^-Ca^
dLr\a,rch iA.ljDfr atPn>.-Tr^l Hearing In open Court.Tn^^y Uhn \ld acknowledge without xedr3SsJiespj>AttitJiixsAn-&a.w — ** the time hem offered ihitddy/then at Suppression Hearing fclatcr would have to enter into aplea /jpauift Jth fie PA LPistrlct Money! f Respondent were to side h/lth State at~ Said Suppression Hearing,
e>,June 1/1Q& at scheduled Suppression Hearing and subsequentJury TrUI,
ll)Jx>.fainV-LTAFoA-didi^uspsna^iihfjjt^ustcAUS^ Relater's right toJuie process of Ui^u.nJiotk oF these necessary proceedings shnJoa Insufficient overriding necessity for such as being jtke^eh/J^S£_b,rMgbt^usJcJ^^ with no indlctment/-
lLuSmMy-L4&.tL-A±ljdmLvel^ later for July/ %/i£lh ' t° recklesslyIaHow I prosecution time to correctthe convolute,' n • l I I l HI \ l ,1 IA SIAIf It I I , ,1 CfitopUi/itjiflo^^ ^uryJifi-Suhsfauetft 'XL /. jndicfm&ift/jajij. 4- './/-/_,.._-h -J -
'IjjdijlAmiBWLl^^ jj(fl____y__Ojb_^ than sufficienttime to j&ttMLMJl^ M/MISL.
„d_-_J___Q^J^^ in the t-___I_^cas.e5_i_i _J)d^__jca_dS_^ : .
Pm&J&- (/) Is clearly Indicative ofthe grpPh lljfrtjlven Ulm LTomny UhnJby prosecution because tilth tie Confidential Tnformant already cp/np forth in the new CASe,this action how Ls loe&n rendered harmless toward Shrfe's cause in the aid cases,And
(11)demonstrates his trMe unwillingness to suppress State's evidence because he LTommy LafonJ never reasserts Relator's right to suppression hutInstead flits thiS Useless motion to bring forward the Confidential Tntorpnant, .
a, Also on July 17.?J0\^ at Consultation for oil four (t) cases cam* the following '
(1)Relator naife second requestef Tommy ighn to subhft motion for examining trial mthe netV Caseffor yvhlch there <,flll tykfed £0 d*V< ^fcre IndictmentLAuju<;flH/2G&l.& total of 75 days in total fry* Relator's original request made on June ZfZOfc.
•fli/Tommy UFon submits amotion -Cnr^Urmi/ery In the new Case gust two months mexistence. with no indictment, In attemptto dUpmt/e Relator's allegations ofIneffective counsel/ h/hen In fact 4)is action only served to effectually substantiate the claims because such discovery was never «>ugkr~hy Tommy LgFon In the three(f) old uses hefore indictment afhr indictment,and /or mosti^porfntfy before he set the cases for tnah
I, T*/"»y l^fo*\ in fiefhredt) nld cases ^ver filed the necessary pretrial motions to ppofct f\e cnnsfttiftflAdl and .statutory rights 0f felafcr^wrllle Pentcnlhcmpsan/Acrdid he rzmsint feUfcr honnrMy in the /lew CAse., 7" omtny UFon hy \i\ver if) flttS yeAcsjif fcgal egrtrienCA/ both defense, and provei/fanglj has III factprrflSSed to havinn knowledge at Criminal proceMCSjiL AvrMlp^fe h\nt»r in all fourfa)ca
_ Tm^y UFon has possessed knowledge of evidence fo inpeach the charge in the new case before indictment/ Vet refused to exercise such atan examining trial on the behalf/of 11 F* _ i **t
his client LfelatorJ.
5, August 31,2015 afso-called Evidence Exchange Tommy UFon was removed or allowed to re.mnve nlmself from Relator's cases. Maction that was txhen because ofthe complaints of his ineffective and insufficient counsel In Relators comprehensive applications fo yrifof habeas corpus suhmltfeJl individually for the tfiree ti) old cases on August VO/WlS
Faae o I- \'
STKTEHEUT OF FACTS
BtujdiJLAUfc^jd^
harch 13;£0l5 at Pre-Trlal Hearing in open court.Respondent/Susan frwOfdid knewingly attempt to coerce Relator. Ouerllle Denton Thompson, info Accepting the minimum time being offered by the District Attorneys Office or agree, to enter into aplea of guiltwitii district district Attorney ifshe should side with Sfatz atsubsy^t Supprp«ien Hearing, This fact should ha verifiable by accessing courtroom minutes and/or transcripts,
_ _ I<2pdMi___<^ 4ftJ_Mi__i_y_^^ has notacted on such despite numerous request from Relator.
3 Respondent has knowledge, jn all four(v cases ofevidence that Jll impeach the charges or iXcjj.[p£li_ielafor by aa.JLtkmugh ff^^r ^^jr^efA_5^ .hutj^.lMLly^S^g.nMC£.d-SJJ.cL.
Respondent fas clear full knowledge by and through Relator's properly sub/nlfhd rwedies and sworn affidavits that '
4, the evidence Uthe three (3) eld rgses r.an.not be used at trial against Relator because SM5±l±uijngJ^ncuits nfLA^fAismMSJi^^iiL-emeAC£. or im y^nJl. ; '. —
fage °l _, In the new case all there exist is mere accusation supported by ho physjcAl evidence or materia] facts just confliefing circusstuffai/hearsay evidence./
f _i_7ij8ssfM!ifc^^ Is that oftightf shall never be suspended .and shorn be renierei speedy and effectual.
Respondent by rfifuilna to acknowledge Relator's evidence ejjainsf his jlLaal restraint ti)nugh Kel&>rJ^pcop^ly_sMbmjfM-rj!^ affjdmfs' is cl^sIy^MAjdnrea^nahlyJinyiQg- fal&tcr U\S right to be heard and due process of law. ,
i., August3l.2CfS in open court the, following facts were establishfid '>
a, Through ler c-.lrrujfeus retortj, Respondent/ Susan Brown/ has acknowledged receipt of Relator QyeriHe Denton Thompson's August20/2015 .submissions ofApplication for Urffof .habeas corpus_mJdudiL
j_Xs_g-£gfe/_i___ &* beingj^.ere^m.oflo-nS-/AnL
(luslnp has removed Tommy UFon nr allowed Tammy UFon to remove himself from Relators _caSp< by stating thatsuch was not dene, because ofanything KeUthr u/nfe.as if Relator had wrote nothing /she uould have reacted j/\ the same, fashion,
LLi^andenttojzjhese£.ojidjda Akfosiflon foivard. Relator and these cases/fr*m which b\&S ran he inferred» Relator issarv Mcl^was^rf^hljzakleJjLa^ . fransrrlpt Ifacafrate-
lag^JO. C, Respondentexpressed far desire that the net/ case should hold priority/ yet jje next )ny on September I/20& wUn
d, Respondent fw very IHHe re^rd If any f>r Raptor's constitutional and statutory rljhfs,
Here.ln lies reasonable suspicion to conclude Huff Respondent/ ifshe ever was/no logger presides^ Impartial Ja these fourit) matters,
X Re
4. Neither parties/actions coincide with guiding principles oflaw.
k3j±h^AitksLa.cticns^lola
CJ>jtk-pArtiieslA^l.oAS^bo.w_co^^
XjL$.os^-p.aidtJesljLctjMsJ^
£jMtk~pAd2JLsLA.cTJMJ^UhM.l^
f_Ml^G±-£te^tC0M.OMS_0)^JjDte k\L-C££&rX^ r
Xflj:.<>/i£We<^^
I&geJL loft'leers she presides oVer in these matters ,Pier discretion Is abusive and clearly needs fo be . igoverned by that of this Court.
0,1 ftefjrfcry Over!Ik Denton Thompson/ has submitted many remedies to "the Iftth Judicial DistrictCurtof Hams County/Texas but he bis confinement could only obtain the submission, dates of those papers that may be \vlewed as pertinent foiward this cause/gnd they are gs listed '<
WPetition for Writaf thbe&s Corpus for Bond Reduction Prized oncp on ^'p\/£> and at/am on ,1/J^/Jfi f-
\bMotion far Evidentiary hearing served nnre on fa/HjjjS and again on ,(j/£/^>, /
\CMotion fo DliMi<n f'/W/j5 f-
d,Application -far Writof Habeas Qrpus separately served for each ofthe 4\ree(3)ald cases on t
e..Application for jJriftf Habeas Corpus served -Porthe new cose nn jJmL^^ '
31 Ptlator Ls provided in the Appendix asworn affidavit -fa satisfy the. Court's exhibit requirement hecn,use. copies sf the documents in guerfloA cj>uld (\of be hereto attached due to Relator's lack of dCCtSS any \nnyr +° tnose materials /y his confinement/ butevidence of their submission can be ascertained jimugh court record of the IfiStk Judicial Plstrict Cturtef Harris County/Te/as and by arresting the Website of Chris Daniel. Harris County District C(er^Jalso as evidence of th August Z0/7MS SjuJsJwssJfinS/4 copy ofeach ofthe threefold rAses. was mailed fo the Court iif Cn^m_^W_mijiW_Q££-(?f t/i
J_J fe laton Overi'lk J/etihn %>mpson/ ha$ made over 10 requests by !~bOf one wrlikn letter ~fo the
. faf. l^ Harris County Sheriff's Office Tnternal Affairs/and two grievance forms/ all in effort for the last three (3) months tv receive from Xomate Sank at Hum's County Jill mHouston/Hams Gantt//Texas an Account Activity Ledger covering the lastsly months ofperformance with no success, butas tn effect such and declare his indgence, Relator has incorporated in the Appendix" a sworn affidavt, Ihtrefore/ Relator now humbly requests that the Court allow him fo proceed in foma\ pauperis,
i_ Relator/Over!He Penton Thompson/iwould also shavthe Court that Relator enjinally-filed an IleafIon for Writ0-P mandamus. In ike Court nf Criminal Appeals en September l3/Z0lSJWl'^3, 7fi7~0iJ and the motion for leave to file Was denied without written order on September 10/ If UB because Relator broke the chain of order In filing such document but Relator does now Correct such error by first apologising to the Court for that unfortunate break in procedure due his ignorance and revest permission to file tils Application In the First Cnurf f Appeals. : :
fgge, 13 ARCUMpiT
\hint I \ Ineffective, and Xnsafficienct Ca^W
l\ To show Ineffective counsel. Relator/Overllle knfon Thompson. moves the Courtto recoj*lze. the two lelemtKh ofsuch In ^^^^Ji^ls^M^JO^S.Ct.^Sr^ll LTdM 3C5(im)4ereln no pretrial discovery'was conducted nortimely Suppression motion filed -Tn Relator's threpCs) •>ld cgsesTommy UFon en March 23.201$ at Fre'Trlal fkarlna does tie following '>
aSets Relator for trial withoutconducting apretrial 41
b,Submits M«tlon for suppression buttle months laternn June 2-/&01S/ suspends the Suppression Hearing and subsequentJuryTUl showing Insujfi'cMntcause, fersuch as being the new case bramkt 4mere IH days friar with MMiifeientlt/ieti on July £7f£6fi. instead cf reauertUg Maoris J ellaht to s-uppressionffom^y UFon files auseless (notion to bring forward ti^e Confidential
Xnfhrmad-/uklrM jn fact indicates bis true unylfllngneSS to suppress Hatek evidence, 'fit. i * ,i
li %kays after tint commencement et Relator's detention/the Stat* u/aS not ready for trial yet Jommy laFofi refused to make an effort fo free Relator from illegal resfriint i(] j . ' . _ i i .ihi -i • i l l
r_L____i.0.W•cases jjhlch Is evidenced by hjs failure to file for the required release sdoail Rhudm-prescrlk) under firflcle 17,151$fill of thzJeXte Qje of CrlmimL ?nceo\ _ _ _
_ _ Tor*tny lj\Ff>n'^ refusal -h, accord Relator an 'x-gmlnlng trial for the ne.WCase as requested having /)/J sufficienttime for such, atotal of' Hdays.\/\o\ated Relator Overllle Denton
_____ : . ?a5e I'd HtnpsnnS nakfs puraia.rfr °fa Article \L0\ of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure,
_ _ Tommy LafoA 's failure or refusal to file any of tie necessary pretrial mctlonS to frofect hl&toris constitutional and statutory rights tn these fcur(t) cases are violations pursuantto the First/Fourth,FIfthjSlxth/Eighth/and fourteenth fimeadmits ofthe United States Constitution/ frtick'lM.S^MMJlO/PftoJI $11 tftbeTenS Constitutionf4hi Article 3111 of tie JoXas U CrJexlnaiAociduR.,
5, Tommy UHn by and ijreugh bis mspiraterlal effortto aid and abetState prosecutor(s) has prejudiced Mafejr_u.nlusjjy_aALunfaJiJyJ>y justcruel and unusual punishment butalso acriminal act of tampering btcause such was dene knowing the falsity ofdocuments and information in ail of the four (H) cases dud using such with . . the lifkiit to affect thy, course oroutrode of Relator's pending criminal procedure pursuant to Textf Penal Codes 931M and §37.10 and violates Relator's rights protected under ihe Eighth/Fourth/
Wgfthe Texas Constitutionfand Article 3113 offin Texas Code of CriminalJrcceJm.,
_ 5IfmiayJLtfjDJLfMy^^ £0 plus yeaTS-ofLtriminaJjM. jy/ie/xe/iceJi^^ to impeach the criminal tmryyL 4<^o__L/?^^
._f_U*M_^^ .|_,_L^£i__2___y^
1, Toj^myuLaB^AiloM!^
%__ a.Adopt into actlvlfy My of Motor's properly snlm\M& motions,
b.Act on Relator's request-h file for an evidentiaryhearing in tjt threefold rjses and examining trial in the mw case.
thereforej Relator/Ov&rllk btntcn Thompson^ forced to resort to e./traord"nan/ remedied Ju? hi$severely madequal? Counsel #nd (l'ega.1 resfralnf/ fas sd^HfeJ fourOj) comprehensive applications for vritgf habeas corpus separately for each oftheSe C4§£ -Jjft? ofthe Texas &*
Py It ARGUMENT
fointJLl Respondent$M*n Bn>Wnfs Refusal to fasuler Relators Properjy Filedj Remedies
I On fAtrrk 11/U>iS/RespondentSusan flr^n i>y alkmpHna to coerce Relator Over!lie kntinlbempion into 0^tiA^fJea^fg.uiJtdld Infgct viojstej^latoris rights wow thzJilftfySixth/t^i£^ $_i__si_L<_^
J* j_^_4o-fck____ii__^ sulmldt^jceiojti^ jjfEiJjdtjDJLkfi^^ violates lelator's rights under the First'/Fourfh/Fifth/Sixth/ElAwfand Fourteenth
oftheTex-as Constitution and Article 3113 of the Texas Code of Crlmlnd Procedure,
.%£__ _il___fe___-- ofawritdJsdmi_L£rpjd$_3r -fie new cgsyldator Overilk flenfcn Thompson Jm^a Sj3__f€fl acx;oAeXA^j^A_mL^ixs^\ng/formal trmgfletifif/Arjejmw !____j___H_i^._^ \! I j
J Contempt'________punishment waj_is^J>j}fk..crjj.el o,nd unusual pursuant fo the frihth 4Amendmentof the llnltzl5id& Constitution/ Article 1§I3 of-fke 7__s Constitution,and > 'dUJoQ.. ajdJ..L..0i^fiLLTmsSJe ofStlmal PrrxedursAlnaddlfi^/viators rights .
j^____y_______^P/f^/J__)rM/W Wfce__J__jg2M^ y L_____^^ CcnstiMcn.and ArticUs 11.01 "k^lUC/llJlJiJLJmU^and ll.% efthzTeM Code of Criminal Procedure. i .1
-5"*.}; _!_^2tvi-k_^..i^__e^ IntlfidjXLaiidJasjifEicleidjtounicL her hosflle and mufizml ^tf^/Y?_______^ principles of law,ana} . \\mf Impe&a^ violates Relators rights vpursuanffo the_Elrstf Flftk/S1WfyEighth/ and Fourfe&Ath Amendments nftbe llritd States iC____M^_^^ m of -fht TevaS Con&lftU .l_ij_fj__^ lU% if the Tew Ue nf Criminal I
]£____
•Jg.i.j Respondent has left,void. ielatork potion for Evidentiary Hearing in the thir.f'Mcllsss^S. iii_g___L_i__l__^ thaf'the[finding of Xfacts'In 5fat? court —\\wifnouf..sucJiJwouid projttJotf) inabamtz And MreAmahl^&Mksisji. _j_^.^ 3±Ljespjte_tke,AmM .ItthiJrlaL^ ^0^.y. Bajftpf- Olsen (fop, HPist . i:J«^M5,k^
.3ge.lt. I IWtniarius Is mmkfo. correctjudicialaction fiiaf:/adores dearbindi/io pmeJlent [because trialjudyes do note-(\\cy freedom toignore ti\e law, kjozaclcfy, Kn j'Ie {(nppJCpislUWlilSS.^Zd
y>\\ Relator/ OvenIk knton Thompson/ has shown f\\e existence of legal duty on the khaff. oT r
-_x_^/_...__-^ i__u__^__L^nW .2L^irst3mJn<^jttk.U&itd MirfisJ^^tidjoAj^^ an establishmentcfnlUlpA,, ' .aj:..dridj.ina...tM..^ :_.._-
tl, F.^r____i_f/>7frt1.._._g..4/d__ States CsrutltufiM, AH\ persons born t>r faturalized in the Unfch Sjzctes and __^_Ltg:_^._^ And ofthe State: therein tkey reside,htofkfe shall ..__-j___£..._^^ _Sai_Je/dW.._y.y?xd__ ts
^rltof Mandamus uert nofreaulmd to be admlsdhte t»i//Ve/if._, __U__Wj.__^^ — .yhe__._ M/iW conducted _Q_a pretrial discovery !a_jand fulled tc file afinely supprtSilcn mtUfi W dysuMtssSiei against ..^l!__C_}_._.
___J_______1^__^ -_f__W__^_l._:._^ ___£fe.._M^
..—._ __L__».u.__ei^
.%!___ I
IMnnasonakk Uen the courtmie -the findings without holdinj an evidejitlary kearlna)y (finding lack efan [evidentiary ktarlna inadequate fc find tacts.), .__. 3li. Slicil\ A-inindme/ttfthe United Sttfos Cpns1itution,£/i all criminal pnfttcuficfiS/the accused shall en ley tie right to a : speuy ana1 pub lie trial/ky an Impartialjury of the Stsfe and district wheeln -the crime shall have, bean zwnffled/. ..tihlcn districtshall hive keen previously, ascertained by law, and tc be.Inferred fif.ths nofare and cause ofthe . [ accusationJ1v he amfhntel with the vltnesSes ajalnst. hl/nyfc.ha^e compulsory process fprckfainlna fitnesses In his fiver/ and to have the .Assistance of Counsel for his defence,..... . 3S, Texas Pencil Cede §37,01, TAflPft&b t&M MFfiMfCMTNO rHVtCftl E\&P£tJCg. ft person co^fr an offense iff knevinjikatan investijafcn or official proceeding is pendlnj. er in progress(he tM^/pr?sents^>r uses any record-, _.. . .demiwnt/orthlnj with knewledae ofits falsifyand with InhnttP affect fhi course erciAtcome.cf.the.__ invesjiaatipn erofficial proceeding *. .__ _ __ _.... %t Texas Penal CcdeSSIAO, ft person cpwlt* <*/. 6ffi?.0*e if he mulcts presents, erases any record JocUMnt^rthing k/lm Ifjnowlidjt it its falsity and wfh intent thatIt be taken as agenuine jcvernnenfalre&rd *
LI aw tmtelatcr Iniiie.dwc proceeding.m. ^kidi..Reif>6mid'ySMSA0.Jktwaytfawnib/e. Judy?., cf[the JiSth Judicial Phtrlct Courtoftkrris.CouAtyT^S,..presides in . Causf_..Mers.lWW/.M5ffl/fl'i(,.i,57/finl l%M3,sty\4 State, of Tem vs, OverilkThompSc(\i ___ _ _.._,__
'£>,\ fa later. iS Minfiffe .tit- thrrls CountyJulIin .tkrris County/Tus....who has keen itvrona(y ._,. cctrfimi tor.th? ctfeoses charted m$0,la cause numbers jnd.to re}U\/e fiIs oppfej^e .ctnl illejdresiralotjnsucl] miters, hasfiki in saij_ exurftiw-followin*,remedies'.
dfetifon fi>r Urif0f tt&lms Corpus for fond Reduction stmd ence en 3/lj/lS and again on jj/i/l$'/
hSpflon for Evidentiary ttearlm served once 0/1^/lj/i^ and AQAin..ci\. */
C.Moflcn fp Plsmlss seri/ed on 7//6V/9 /
Atpplla&icn. for h/nfef kkas Corpus septrctlyserYeLfbrmh cfife :fhmb)old.oc&s en y§JtO/lS> /
£» Relator furtiicr declares thtjfjn the last It months/ he ha< received no men: in total jjgn __Ld^_^________^ ._J_ij_i__^^ ad rnonths. . ._ ;
3* delator has keen detained since October tt/jjpl1] ^d is currently confined of tiarri§_. £tutf£h__lj__3__^
.ihduAil^.my..^ . . __
IH Fom/t FfiUfERXS r?aae) nt^JaeW .„.J_4:_r--e_3_ lMdjAim..£.r.iimryJls.iiS^hclisftiniiskitijS^nl^bfb'jyyJ^rythlm has hemJosffohim during the unlawful invasion jf hk r^i^icc _y> Qrf7>jper tZyiO.^ .___.4_._%lj^
_._^._6l ofJktAr.y.Ml&.. Til CftOn/tA Om\ ncn^r-r Co n -P/?l •7,1 Disciplinary and Grievance Section Date: 9/16/2015
To Inmate: THOMPSON, OVERILLE DENTON SPN# 2425321
Location JA09 6E1A01
FROM: Inmate Grievance Board
Your complaint regarding BANKING/VALUABLE PROPERTY
has been received by the Grievance Board. After review, it has been determined this matter does not conform to criteria applicable to a grievable issue as outlined in the Inmate Handbook, but instead is a Banking request
Your request will be referred to a supervisor. No further action will be taken by the Grievance Board regarding this matter.
You are required to review and follow the approved Grievance procedure on all future complaints.
INMATE GRIEVANCE BOARD ?af>3\ Disciplinary and Grievance Section Date: 9/25/2015
To Inmate: THOMPSON, OVERILLE DENTON SP/V# 2425321
has been received by the Grievance Board. After review, it has been determined this matter does not conform to criteria applicable to a grievable issue as outlined in the Inmate Handbook, but instead is a Banking request
Your request will be referred to a supervisor. No further action will be taken by the Grievance Board regarding this matter.
You are required to review and follow the approved Grievance procedure on all future complaints.
INMATE GRIEVANCE BOARD fyt 31- Case fdo.MSW . ... H^30 mm mm
2rt re./ (fertile Penton Thompson, Matery \ V. Susan Brown V Respondent,