in Re Otto Ray Kietzman
This text of in Re Otto Ray Kietzman (in Re Otto Ray Kietzman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FILE COPY
In re Otto Ray KietzmanAppellant/s
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas March 24, 2014
No. 04-14-00185-CR
IN RE Otto Ray KIETZMAN
Original Mandamus Proceeding1
ORDER
Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
On March 20, 2014, relator filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus. The court has considered relator’s petition and is of the opinion that relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). Relator’s request for leave to file the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED AS MOOT. The court’s opinion will issue at a later date.
It is so ORDERED on March 24th, 2014.
_____________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 24th day of March, 2014.
_____________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2013W0631, styled The State of Texas v. Otto Ray Kietzman, pending in the Criminal District Court, Magistrate Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Andrew Carruthers presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Otto Ray Kietzman, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-otto-ray-kietzman-texapp-2014.