In re Otonicar

261 S.E.2d 634, 244 Ga. 674, 1979 Ga. LEXIS 1374
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedNovember 7, 1979
DocketSupreme Court Disciplinary No. 40
StatusPublished

This text of 261 S.E.2d 634 (In re Otonicar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Otonicar, 261 S.E.2d 634, 244 Ga. 674, 1979 Ga. LEXIS 1374 (Ga. 1979).

Opinion

Per curiam.

The findings of the State Disciplinary Board that the respondent wilfully misrepresented the status of a claim he had been employed to pursue violated Standard 4 of State Bar Rule 4-102, and disregarded a legal matter entrusted to him violated Standard 44 of State Bar Rule 4-102, are affirmed.

In accordance with the recommendation of the State Disciplinary Board, it is ordered that the respondent receive a public reprimand before the Superior Court of [675]*675Fulton County.

Decided November 7, 1979. Richard Otonicar, pro se. Omer W. Franklin, Jr., General Counsel State Bar, James E. Spence, Jr., Assistant General Counsel State Bar, Robert H. Davis, Assistant General Counsel State Bar, for State Bar of Georgia. All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
261 S.E.2d 634, 244 Ga. 674, 1979 Ga. LEXIS 1374, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-otonicar-ga-1979.