In re Osman

181 A.D.2d 868
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 30, 1992
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 181 A.D.2d 868 (In re Osman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Osman, 181 A.D.2d 868 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

— In two related matters on behalf of and relative to the dissolution of Long Island Paneling Centers, Inc., Arnold Osman appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Molloy, J.), dated August 21, 1990, which denied his motion to compel the receiver of the corporation to continue to pay him $4,100 per week in accordance with two previous orders of the same court dated December 28, 1988, and February 10, 1989, respectively.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Upon being alerted by the court-appointed accountant that Long Island Paneling Centers, Inc., a corporation in dissolution, was being assessed for up to $1,900,000 in unpaid taxes, the court directed the receiver to suspend payment of the salaries of $4,100 per week of the two principals of the corporation, Arnold Osman and Frank Sternberg. When Arnold Osman moved, inter alia, to have his salary reinstated, the court denied his application.

The Supreme Court "is vested with inherent plenary power with original jurisdiction in law and equity [and] it is authorized to render such relief as may be necessary to protect the rights of any party [before it] (NY Const, art VI, § 7; Judiciary Law § 140-b)” (Matter of Schwartzreich, 136 AD2d 642, 643). In keeping with the court’s various orders directing the temporary receiver to take all steps reasonably necessary to protect and preserve the assets of the corporation, the order appealed from directing the receiver temporarily to withhold the [869]*869weekly salaries of the appellant and his coprincipal Frank Sternberg "was in furtherance of the preservation of assets pending the dissolution [of the corporation]” (Matter of Schwartzreich, supra, at 643). Because the Supreme Court at bar had jurisdiction over Osman, Sternberg and Long Island Paneling Centers, Inc., which in turn had a controlling interest in various satellite stores, it had authority to direct the withholding by Long Island Paneling Centers, Inc., of the salaries payable to Osman and Sternberg, pending final determination of the magnitude of the corporation’s tax debt.

We find no merit to the parties’ remaining contentions. Sullivan, J. P., Balletta, Lawrence and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of ANO, Inc. v. Goldberg
2018 NY Slip Op 8476 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
181 A.D.2d 868, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-osman-nyappdiv-1992.