In re Osborne

Supreme Court of Georgia

In re Osborne

280 S.E.2d 625, 247 Ga. 153, 1981 Ga. LEXIS 662

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided February 17, 1981·No. Supreme Court Disciplinary No. 132·Published

Opinion

Per curiam.

The respondent, Harry A. Osborne, attorney, having filed an amended petition for voluntary discipline, namely a public [154]*154reprimand, and the special master having recommended that respondent’s amended petition be accepted and that respondent receive a public reprimand, the decision of the special master is approved and it is ordered that Harry A. Osborne receive a public reprimand as provided by the rules of the State Bar of Georgia.

Decided February 17, 1981. Omer W. Franklin, Jr., General Counsel State Bar, Viola L. Sellers, Assistant General Counsel State Bar, for State Bar of Georgia. G. Robert Oliver, for Osborne.

It is so ordered.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per curiam.

The respondent, Harry A. Osborne, attorney, having filed an amended petition for voluntary discipline, namely a public [154]*154reprimand, and the special master having recommended that respondent’s amended petition be accepted and that respondent receive a public reprimand, the decision of the special master is approved and it is ordered that Harry A. Osborne receive a public reprimand as provided by the rules of the State Bar of Georgia.

Decided February 17, 1981. Omer W. Franklin, Jr., General Counsel State Bar, Viola L. Sellers, Assistant General Counsel State Bar, for State Bar of Georgia. G. Robert Oliver, for Osborne.

It is so ordered.

All the Justices concur.

In re Osborne, 280 S.E.2d 625, 247 Ga. 153, 1981 Ga. LEXIS 662 (Ga. 1981).

Pincite

280 S.E.2d 625 (In re Osborne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.