In re Osborne

California Court of Appeal

In re Osborne

13 Cal. App. 735

California Court of Appeal·Decided July 6, 1910·No. Crim. No. 142·Published

Opinion

THE COURT.

The court is unable to concur in a judgment either for remanding the prisoner or discharging him, and, under article VI, section 4, of the constitution, and upon the authority of Ex parte Oates, 2 Cal. App. xiii, [83 Pac. 261], and Ex parte Sauer, 3 Cal. App. 237, [84 Pac. 995], the writ must be regarded as'denied, and it is so ordered.

It is further ordered, that upon the return of the prisoner to the custody of the sheriff, or upon his resumption of the custody of the prisoner, the order for bail pending the proceedings be discharged, and, if money was deposited by him in lieu of bail, that it be returned to him by the clerk of the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

The court is unable to concur in a judgment either for remanding the prisoner or discharging him, and, under article VI, section 4, of the constitution, and upon the authority of Ex parte Oates, 2 Cal. App. xiii, [83 Pac. 261], and Ex parte Sauer, 3 Cal. App. 237, [84 Pac. 995], the writ must be regarded as'denied, and it is so ordered.

It is further ordered, that upon the return of the prisoner to the custody of the sheriff, or upon his resumption of the custody of the prisoner, the order for bail pending the proceedings be discharged, and, if money was deposited by him in lieu of bail, that it be returned to him by the clerk of the court.

In re Osborne, 13 Cal. App. 735 (Cal. Ct. App. 1910).

Pincite

13 Cal. App. 735 (In re Osborne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related