in Re Osbaldo Guerra Individually and D/B/A on Call Delivery Services
This text of in Re Osbaldo Guerra Individually and D/B/A on Call Delivery Services (in Re Osbaldo Guerra Individually and D/B/A on Call Delivery Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-22-00305-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
IN RE OSBALDO GUERRA INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A ON CALL DELIVERY SERVICES
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
ORDER
Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Tijerina Order Per Curiam
On July 7, 2022, relator Osbaldo Guerra individually and d/b/a On Call Delivery
Services filed a petition for writ of mandamus and an emergency motion for temporary
stay. By petition for writ of mandamus, the relator asserts that the trial court’s May 19,
2022 order allowing relator to conduct Rule 204 medical examinations on real parties in
interest Armando Aguilar and Andres Perez Jr. constitutes an abuse of discretion
because the order allows the examinations to be made by telephone and to be either recorded or performed with a medical provider of the real parties’ choosing present during
the exams. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 204. By emergency motion for temporary stay, relator
seeks to stay the underlying trial court proceedings, including approaching deadlines,
pending resolution of this original proceeding.
The Court, having examined and fully considered the relator’s emergency motion
for temporary stay, is of the opinion that it should be granted. Accordingly, we grant the
emergency motion for temporary stay, and we order the trial court proceedings and
outstanding deadlines, specifically including expert designation deadlines, to be stayed
pending further order of this Court, or until this case is finally decided. See TEX. R. APP.
P. 52.10(b).
The Court requests that the real parties in interest, Aguilar and Perez, or any others
whose interest would be directly affected by the relief sought, file a response to the
petition for writ of mandamus on or before the expiration of ten days from the date of this
order. See id. R. 52.2, 52.4, 52.8.
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed on the 8th day of July, 2022.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Osbaldo Guerra Individually and D/B/A on Call Delivery Services, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-osbaldo-guerra-individually-and-dba-on-call-delivery-services-texapp-2022.