in Re Osbaldo Guerra Individually and D/B/A on Call Delivery Services

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 8, 2022
Docket13-22-00305-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re Osbaldo Guerra Individually and D/B/A on Call Delivery Services (in Re Osbaldo Guerra Individually and D/B/A on Call Delivery Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re Osbaldo Guerra Individually and D/B/A on Call Delivery Services, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-22-00305-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

IN RE OSBALDO GUERRA INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A ON CALL DELIVERY SERVICES

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

ORDER

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Tijerina Order Per Curiam

On July 7, 2022, relator Osbaldo Guerra individually and d/b/a On Call Delivery

Services filed a petition for writ of mandamus and an emergency motion for temporary

stay. By petition for writ of mandamus, the relator asserts that the trial court’s May 19,

2022 order allowing relator to conduct Rule 204 medical examinations on real parties in

interest Armando Aguilar and Andres Perez Jr. constitutes an abuse of discretion

because the order allows the examinations to be made by telephone and to be either recorded or performed with a medical provider of the real parties’ choosing present during

the exams. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 204. By emergency motion for temporary stay, relator

seeks to stay the underlying trial court proceedings, including approaching deadlines,

pending resolution of this original proceeding.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the relator’s emergency motion

for temporary stay, is of the opinion that it should be granted. Accordingly, we grant the

emergency motion for temporary stay, and we order the trial court proceedings and

outstanding deadlines, specifically including expert designation deadlines, to be stayed

pending further order of this Court, or until this case is finally decided. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 52.10(b).

The Court requests that the real parties in interest, Aguilar and Perez, or any others

whose interest would be directly affected by the relief sought, file a response to the

petition for writ of mandamus on or before the expiration of ten days from the date of this

order. See id. R. 52.2, 52.4, 52.8.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed on the 8th day of July, 2022.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re Osbaldo Guerra Individually and D/B/A on Call Delivery Services, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-osbaldo-guerra-individually-and-dba-on-call-delivery-services-texapp-2022.