In re Ortiz
This text of 97 A.D.3d 885 (In re Ortiz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[886]*886Claimant, an administrative assistant, was terminated for insubordination after she refused to cooperate with the employer’s investigation of an earlier incident involving an angry dispute that claimant had with a tenant’s employee. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruled that she was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she lost her job due to misconduct. Claimant appeals and we affirm.
“An employee’s failure to comply with an employer’s reasonable request may constitute insubordination rising to the level of disqualifying misconduct” (Matter of Guagliardo [Commissioner of Labor], 27 AD3d 866, 867 [2006] [citations omitted]; see Matter of Setzer [Commissioner of Labor], 69 AD3d 1087 [2010]). Here, claimant admittedly refused repeated requests by the employer’s director that she discuss the incident with him. Given the reasonableness of this request and the absence of a compelling reason for claimant’s refusal (see Matter of Guagliardo [Commissioner of Labor], 27 AD3d at 867), we find no basis to reverse the Board’s decision.
Rose, J.P., Spain, Kavanagh, McCarthy and Egan Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
97 A.D.3d 885, 947 N.Y.2d 350, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ortiz-nyappdiv-2012.