In Re: Orso

283 F.3d 686
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In Re: Orso. Read the opinion of the Court — 283 F.3d 686
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 15, 2001·No. 98-31008·Published

Opinion

242 F.3d 534 (5th Cir. 2001)

In The Matter of: PAUL WILLIAM ORSO, Debtor
VALERIE CANFIELD Appellant
v.
PAUL WILLIAM ORSO; MARTIN A. SCHOTT, Appellees

No. 98-31008

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS, FIFTH CIRCUIT

February 9, 2001

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC (Opinion June 27, 2000, 5 Cir., 2000, 214 F.3d 637)

Before KING, Chief Judge, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service has requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc filed by Paul William Orso, and a majority of the judges in active service have voted in favor of granting the rehearing en banc. Further, a majority of the judges in active service have determined, on the court's own motion, to rehear this case en banc as to Martin A. Schott.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re: Orso, 283 F.3d 686 (5th Cir. 2001).

283 F.3d 686 (In Re: Orso) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Canfield v. Orso
214 F.3d 637 (Fifth Circuit, 2000)