In Re: Orso

283 F.3d 686
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 15, 2001
Docket98-31008
StatusPublished

This text of 283 F.3d 686 (In Re: Orso) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re: Orso, 283 F.3d 686 (5th Cir. 2001).

Opinion

242 F.3d 534 (5th Cir. 2001)

In The Matter of: PAUL WILLIAM ORSO, Debtor
VALERIE CANFIELD Appellant
v.
PAUL WILLIAM ORSO; MARTIN A. SCHOTT, Appellees

No. 98-31008

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS, FIFTH CIRCUIT

February 9, 2001

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC (Opinion June 27, 2000, 5 Cir., 2000, 214 F.3d 637)

Before KING, Chief Judge, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service has requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc filed by Paul William Orso, and a majority of the judges in active service have voted in favor of granting the rehearing en banc. Further, a majority of the judges in active service have determined, on the court's own motion, to rehear this case en banc as to Martin A. Schott.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Canfield v. Orso
214 F.3d 637 (Fifth Circuit, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
283 F.3d 686, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-orso-ca5-2001.