In re Orseck

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Orseck

281 A.D.2d 691, 722 N.Y.S.2d 920, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2321

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Orseck. Read the opinion of the Court — 262 A.D.2d 862 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 7, 2001·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Respondent was suspended from practice for a period of 18 months (see, Matter of Orseck, 262 AD2d 862) and now applies for reinstatement.

Our examination of the papers submitted on this application indicates that respondent has complied with the provisions of the order which suspended him and with this Court’s rule regarding the conduct of suspended attorneys (see, 22 NYCRR 806.9). We are also satisfied that he has complied with the requirements of this Court’s rule regarding reinstatement (see, 22 NYCRR 806.12) and that he possesses the requisite character and fitness to resume the practice of law.

Accordingly, the application is granted, and respondent is reinstated to the practice of law, effective immediately.

Crew III, J. P., Spain, Carpinello and Rose, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent’s application is granted and he is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Respondent was suspended from practice for a period of 18 months (see, Matter of Orseck, 262 AD2d 862) and now applies for reinstatement.

Our examination of the papers submitted on this application indicates that respondent has complied with the provisions of the order which suspended him and with this Court’s rule regarding the conduct of suspended attorneys (see, 22 NYCRR 806.9). We are also satisfied that he has complied with the requirements of this Court’s rule regarding reinstatement (see, 22 NYCRR 806.12) and that he possesses the requisite character and fitness to resume the practice of law.

Accordingly, the application is granted, and respondent is reinstated to the practice of law, effective immediately.

Crew III, J. P., Spain, Carpinello and Rose, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent’s application is granted and he is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

In re Orseck, 281 A.D.2d 691, 722 N.Y.S.2d 920, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2321 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

281 A.D.2d 691 (In re Orseck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related