In re Orseck

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Orseck

87 A.D.2d 939, 450 N.Y.S.2d 443, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16466

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 23, 1982·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Petitioner, who, by order dated June 15,1981, was suspended as an attorney and counselor at law for a period of six months, has applied for reinstatement. The application was referred to the Committee on Character and Fitness for the Third Judicial District, which, after investigation, has reported that petitioner possesses the requisite character and fitness to resume the practice of law. Application granted and petitioner reinstated as an attorney and counselor at law effective immediately. Mahoney, P. J., Sweeney, Main, Mikoll and Yesawich, Jr., JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petitioner, who, by order dated June 15,1981, was suspended as an attorney and counselor at law for a period of six months, has applied for reinstatement. The application was referred to the Committee on Character and Fitness for the Third Judicial District, which, after investigation, has reported that petitioner possesses the requisite character and fitness to resume the practice of law. Application granted and petitioner reinstated as an attorney and counselor at law effective immediately. Mahoney, P. J., Sweeney, Main, Mikoll and Yesawich, Jr., JJ., concur.

In re Orseck, 87 A.D.2d 939, 450 N.Y.S.2d 443, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16466 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

87 A.D.2d 939 (In re Orseck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related