In re Orlando's Estate

New York Surrogate's Court

In re Orlando's Estate

148 N.Y.S. 270

DecidedJune 17, 1914

StatusPublished

This text of 148 N.Y.S. 270 (In re Orlando's Estate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Surrogate's Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Orlando's Estate, 148 N.Y.S. 270 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

VANDERZEE, S.

The decedent Vincenzo Orlando died December 8, 1913, intestate, leaving him surviving a widow and a minor child, residents and subjects of the kingdom of Italy. The decedent at the time of his death was a resident of this county and an Italian subject.

[1] On December 22, 1913, letters of administration were issqed to Germano P. Baccelli, the consul representing the Italian kingdom in this county. Thereafter the widow of the decedent came to this country, took up a residence here, bringing with her the minor child, and now petitions.a revocation of the letters granted to the consul and that letters issue to her. The petition asks revocation for the reason that she now has a prior right under the statute and that letters were granted without notice to her.

That the letters were properly awarded to the consul is not questioned. The issue is: Should such letters now be revoked because the widow, who was not qualified to receive them when they were granted, now has come within the jurisdiction, thereby removing her disqualification by alienage ?

In the Matter of McDonald, 211 N. Y. 272, 105 N. E. 407, recently decided by the Court of Appeals, it is said:

“Letters of administration once properly issued, can only be revoked under some power which the law has conferred upon Surrogates’ Courts.”

None of the causes for removal enumerated in section 2685 of the Code is alleged or proven. The McDonald Case is controlling and makes any extended discussion unnecessary. The application of the widow must be denied.

[2] Upon the argument and in his brief the administrator offers to file security for faithful performance and obedience to lawful decrees. No bond was required when letters were issued, because all the next of kin were aliens and the assets were distributable by direction of a foreign jurisdiction. Now, however, a change has come by the [272]*272presence of the distributees in this, country, and accordingly a distribution under the direction of this court.

The administrator should therefore file a bond in the penalty of $5,000.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

VANDERZEE, S.

The decedent Vincenzo Orlando died December 8, 1913, intestate, leaving him surviving a widow and a minor child, residents and subjects of the kingdom of Italy. The decedent at the time of his death was a resident of this county and an Italian subject.

[1] On December 22, 1913, letters of administration were issqed to Germano P. Baccelli, the consul representing the Italian kingdom in this county. Thereafter the widow of the decedent came to this country, took up a residence here, bringing with her the minor child, and now petitions.a revocation of the letters granted to the consul and that letters issue to her. The petition asks revocation for the reason that she now has a prior right under the statute and that letters were granted without notice to her.

That the letters were properly awarded to the consul is not questioned. The issue is: Should such letters now be revoked because the widow, who was not qualified to receive them when they were granted, now has come within the jurisdiction, thereby removing her disqualification by alienage ?

In the Matter of McDonald, 211 N. Y. 272, 105 N. E. 407, recently decided by the Court of Appeals, it is said:

“Letters of administration once properly issued, can only be revoked under some power which the law has conferred upon Surrogates’ Courts.”

None of the causes for removal enumerated in section 2685 of the Code is alleged or proven. The McDonald Case is controlling and makes any extended discussion unnecessary. The application of the widow must be denied.

[2] Upon the argument and in his brief the administrator offers to file security for faithful performance and obedience to lawful decrees. No bond was required when letters were issued, because all the next of kin were aliens and the assets were distributable by direction of a foreign jurisdiction. Now, however, a change has come by the [272]*272presence of the distributees in this, country, and accordingly a distribution under the direction of this court.

The administrator should therefore file a bond in the penalty of $5,000.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

148 N.Y.S. 270, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-orlandos-estate-nysurct-1914.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack