In Re: Order Amending Rules 801-816, 818 and 820, and Ascending Rule 817 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure Governing Actions and Proceedings before Magisterial District Judges

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMarch 13, 2015
Docket382 Magisterial Rules Docket
StatusPublished

This text of In Re: Order Amending Rules 801-816, 818 and 820, and Ascending Rule 817 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure Governing Actions and Proceedings before Magisterial District Judges (In Re: Order Amending Rules 801-816, 818 and 820, and Ascending Rule 817 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure Governing Actions and Proceedings before Magisterial District Judges) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re: Order Amending Rules 801-816, 818 and 820, and Ascending Rule 817 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure Governing Actions and Proceedings before Magisterial District Judges, (Pa. 2015).

Opinion

CHAPTER 800. MINORS AND [INCOMPETENTS] INCAPACITATED PERSONS AS PARTIES

Rule 801. Definitions.

As used in this chapter:

(1) “Action” includes a civil action as defined by Rule 301 and an action by a landlord against a tenant for the recovery of possession of real property pursuant to Rule 501.

Official Note This chapter applies to all actions, civil in nature, within the jurisdiction of a magisterial district judge.

(2) “Minor” means an individual under the age of eighteen years.

(3) [“Incompetent”] “Incapacitated person” means [Anyone] an adult who [, because of his incompetency,] has a guardian appointed by a court of competent jurisdiction pursuant to 20 Pa.C.S. § 5511.

(4) “Guardian”, except as otherwise indicated in Rules 808B and 816B, means —

(a) in the case of a minor, a guardian of the minor appointed by any court of competent jurisdiction or by a probated will, a parent of the minor or, if selected by the minor to represent him as guardian, any adult person.

(b) in the case of [incompetents] incapacitated persons, a guardian or other fiduciary appointed by a court of competent jurisdiction for the incapacitated person or the incapacitated person’s estate [of an incompetent].

Official Note: The definition of ‘‘minor’’ is the same as that set forth in Pa.R.C.P. No. 76 and is in conformity with pertinent statutory provisions. See, for example, [Act of December 6, 1972, P. L. 1404, No. 300, § 1, 11 P.S. § 1901] § 102 of the Probate, Estates and Fiduciaries Code, 20 Pa.C.S. § 102. ‘‘[Incompetent] Incapacitated person’’ is defined as one who already has a guardian appointed [because of incompetency] pursuant to 20 Pa.C.S. § 5511, the reason for not adopting the rest of the definition in Pa.R.C.P. No. 2051 being principally that a magisterial district judge should not become involved in appointing guardians ad litem. The definition of ‘‘guardian’’ with respect to a minor is necessarily broad in view of the system adopted in Rule 805. The definition of ‘‘guardian’’ with respect to an [incompetent] incapacitated person follows generally that found in Pa.R.C.P. No. 2051. Rule 802. Minor May Be Party to Action.

[Whether or not he is represented by a guardian a minor may be a party to an action] A minor is not required to be represented by a guardian in an action before a magisterial district judge.

Official Note: Under this rule, a minor need not be represented by a guardian in a civil action before a magisterial district judge. This is a departure from the procedure in other tribunals prescribed by Pa.R.C.P. Nos. 2027 and 2031. This difference in procedure is due in part to the determination that magisterial district judges should not be required or allowed to appoint guardians ad litem, considering the expedition with which civil actions before magisterial district judges are required to be handled under the general rules of civil procedure applicable to magisterial district judges. Since magisterial district judges will not be permitted to appoint guardians ad litem (see Rule 819), it would be manifestly unfair to allow a minor plaintiff to bring suit by a ‘‘next friend’’ guardian but to require the appointment of a guardian by a court of common pleas before a suit could be brought against a minor defendant. It is considered that ample protection will be afforded the minor party under Rule 805. See also the note to Rule 807.

The rules in this chapter are not, of course, intended to change the law governing the basic legal liability of minors.

2 Rule 803. Entitlement of Complaint.

The complaint in an action before a magisterial district judge to which a minor is a party shall be entitled in the name of the minor, without reference to [his] the party’s minority or any guardian.

Official Note: The complaint will be entitled in the name of the minor, whether plaintiff or defendant. If a guardian does represent [him] the minor, this will be reflected by a notice of intent to represent attached to the complaint form as required by Rule 805B.

3 Rule 804. Service of the Complaint.

Service of the complaint upon a minor defendant, or of a cross-complaint upon a minor plaintiff, shall be upon the minor in the manner prescribed for service of like process upon an adult party.

Official Note: See [Pa.R.C.P. No. 2029(a)] Rules 307, 308 and 315.

4 Rule 805. Representation of Minor by Guardian.

A. A guardian may represent a minor party by filing with the magisterial district judge before whom the action is pending a written notice stating [his] the guardian’s name, address, entitlement to act as guardian under Rule 801[(3)](4)(a) and [that he intends] intention to represent the minor party as guardian. Such a notice shall be filed on a Guardian’s Notice of Intent to Represent Minor Party form.

B. Upon receipt of a notice of intent to act as guardian, the magisterial district judge shall note thereon the time and date of its filing and attach it to the record copy of the complaint form.

C. Only one guardian may represent the minor party. If more than one person files a notice of intent to act as guardian, precedence shall be given in the order indicated in Rule 801[(3)](4)(a), and to the one first filing as between those of the same class.

Official Note: Subdivision A sets up a system which is intended to preserve expedition in the processing of civil cases before magisterial district judges in which a minor is a party and at the same time afford sufficient protection to the minor. Under this rule, read in connection with the definition of ‘‘guardian’’ in Rule 801[(3)](4)(a), guardians appointed by a court or by will and parents can represent the minor with or without [his] the minor’s consent, but others are subject to [his] the minor’s selection. Subdivision B requires the notice of intent to be attached to the complaint form, and subdivision C provides for an automatic selection as between competing ‘‘guardians’’. Of course, one who has filed a notice of intent to represent may withdraw, in which event the next guardian in precedence, if any, would represent the minor party.

5 Rule 806. Guardian to Supervise Action.

When a minor party is represented by a guardian—

(1) The guardian shall supervise and control the conduct of the action in behalf of the minor.

(2) Notices required to be given by the magisterial district judge [under Rules 318, 319B and 324] shall, if the party to whom the notice must be given is a minor represented by a guardian, be given to the guardian.

Official Note: Compare Pa.R.C.P. No[s]. 2027[, 2029(b)].

6 Rule 807. Judgment; Costs.

A. Judgment may be entered for or against the minor party whether or not [he] the minor party is represented by a guardian.

B. A judgment entered in the action shall be the obligation of the minor only. A guardian shall not be individually liable for the payment of any judgment entered against the minor or for the costs of the action.

Official Note: Subdivision A of this rule follows the concept adopted in Rule 802. In view of the right of appeal de novo from judgments rendered by magisterial district judges and the protections that are available under these rules, it was felt that such a judgment against a minor party should not be set aside, even as a discretionary matter, on the ground that the minor was not represented by a guardian. Compare Hamilton v. Moore, 335 Pa. 433, 6 A.2d 787 (1939).

As to subdivision B, compare Pa.R.C.P. No. 2038. Requiring a minor plaintiff’s guardian to pay costs seemed undesirable and unnecessary with respect to civil actions before magisterial district judges.

7 Rule 808. Compromise, Settlement, Discontinuance and Payment.

A.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hamilton v. Moore
6 A.2d 787 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1939)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
In Re: Order Amending Rules 801-816, 818 and 820, and Ascending Rule 817 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure Governing Actions and Proceedings before Magisterial District Judges, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-order-amending-rules-801-816-818-and-820-and-ascending-rule-817-of-pa-2015.