In re Orange County Department of Social Services

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Orange County Department of Social Services

103 A.D.3d 631, 959 N.Y.S.2d 445

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 6, 2013

StatusPublished

This text of 103 A.D.3d 631 (In re Orange County Department of Social Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Orange County Department of Social Services, 103 A.D.3d 631, 959 N.Y.S.2d 445 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

In related child neglect proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the mother appeals from an order of fact-finding and disposition of the Family Court, Orange County (Woods, J.), dated November 21, 2011, which, after a fact-finding hearing, inter alia, found that she neglected the subject children.

Ordered that the order of fact-finding and disposition is reversed, on the facts, without costs or disbursements, the petitions are denied, and the proceedings are dismissed.

A finding that a child is neglected must be based on a preponderance of the evidence (see Family Ct Act § 1046 [b] [i]; Matter of Kassandra V. [Sylvia L.], 90 AD3d 940, 941 [2011]). Here, the petitioner failed to establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the mother neglected her children.

As a result of our determination, the mother’s remaining contentions have been rendered academic. Dillon, J.P., Angiolillo, Leventhal and Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In related child neglect proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the mother appeals from an order of fact-finding and disposition of the Family Court, Orange County (Woods, J.), dated November 21, 2011, which, after a fact-finding hearing, inter alia, found that she neglected the subject children.

Ordered that the order of fact-finding and disposition is reversed, on the facts, without costs or disbursements, the petitions are denied, and the proceedings are dismissed.

A finding that a child is neglected must be based on a preponderance of the evidence (see Family Ct Act § 1046 [b] [i]; Matter of Kassandra V. [Sylvia L.], 90 AD3d 940, 941 [2011]). Here, the petitioner failed to establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the mother neglected her children.

As a result of our determination, the mother’s remaining contentions have been rendered academic. Dillon, J.P., Angiolillo, Leventhal and Miller, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

103 A.D.3d 631, 959 N.Y.S.2d 445, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-orange-county-department-of-social-services-nyappdiv-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack