In re Oppenhein
261 A.D. 925, 26 N.Y.S.2d 319, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8112
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 18, 1941·Published
Opinion
Order of the Surrogate’s Court, Kings County, denying appellants’ motion for a further bill of particulars, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, payable out of the estate. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Taylor, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Oppenhein, 261 A.D. 925, 26 N.Y.S.2d 319, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8112 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).
261 A.D. 925 (In re Oppenhein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.