In Re Opinion of the Justices

162 So. 123, 230 Ala. 543, 1935 Ala. LEXIS 257
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedJune 18, 1935
DocketNo. 32.
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 162 So. 123 (In Re Opinion of the Justices) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Opinion of the Justices, 162 So. 123, 230 Ala. 543, 1935 Ala. LEXIS 257 (Ala. 1935).

Opinion

June 10, 1935.

To the Honorable Chief Justice and Associate Justices of the Supreme Court of Alabama:

Gentlemen: 'As Governor of Alabama, I desire the opinion of the Supreme Court of Alabama on the following constitutional questions involving the constitutionality of the provisions of House Bill No. 97, copy of which is hereto attached. ,

This request is made under the authority of Section 10290, Code of Alabama of 1923, and Section 10291 as amended by Acts of 1927, page 103.

1. Is the title to the bill sufficiently comprehensive under and in compliance with Section 45 of the Constitution of Alabama ?

2. Is the bill a valid exercise by the legislature of the police power of the State?

3. Does the bill or any section thereof violate the due process clause of Section 1 of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States?

(a) Does the bill, or any section therer of violate the due process clause of Section 1 of the 14th Amendment to the C6nr stitution of the United States in failing to provide for due notice and hearing?,

(b) Does the bill, or any section .thereof, violate the due process clause of Seer tion 1 of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States in failing to provide for a judicial hearing before' á constituted judicial tribunal of the State?

(c) Does the bilí, or any section thereof, violate the due process clause of Section 1 of the 14th Amendment to tlje 'Constitution of the United States in failing to provide for the right of appeal to or rer view by the constituted judicial tribunals of the State?

4. Is the bill based upon a reasonable classification in failing to include all individuals in the State suffering from the dishabilles and causes enumerated whether confined in one of the institutions named or not, within the purview of Section 1 of *544 the 14th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States?

5. Is the bill, or any part of it, penal in its nature and does it, or any part of it, violate Section 15 of the Bill of Rights prohibiting cruel and unusual punishment?

Briefs as to the constitutionality and unconstitutionality of said House Bill No. 87 are also enclosed herewith.

Respectfully,

Bibb Graves,

Governor.

A Bill To Be Entitled An Act to authorize and provide for the sterilization of particular types of mental disease, insane, epileptic, mentally deficient, criminal and delinquent persons in the State of Alabama, to provide and define method of obtaining authority in each case and by whom authority is to be granted, to define and name method of sterilization and to designate by whom expenses of such sterilization are to be . borne, and protecting against -civil or criminal prosecution persons legally participating in the execution of the provisions of this Act.

Be It Enacted by the Legislature of Alabama:

Section One: — Before any person, who has been lawfully committed to any hospital for insane in the State of Alabama, shall be released or discharged therefrom, and who is, or has been, in the opinion of the superintendent of such hospital, afflicted with mental disease which may have been inherited, or which in the opinion of such superintendent is likely to be transmitted to descendants, such as the various grades of mental deficiency, those suffering from perversions, constitutional psychopathic personalities or marked departures from normal mentality, the superintendent of such institutions shall, in his discretion, after a careful investigation of all the available history, circumstances, facts and symptoms of the case, cause such jferson to be sterilized or rendered incapable of propagation, whether with or without the consent of the patient, or his or her relatives.

Section Two: — Before any person, who has been lawfully committed to any institution for mental deficients or feeble-minded in the State of Alabama, shall be released or discharged therefrom, and who is or has been, in the opinion of the superintendent of such institution, afflicted with mental deficiency of any grade which may have been inherited or which, in the opinion of such superintendent, is likely to be transmitted to descendants, such mental deficient may be sterilized or rendered incapable of propagation with or without his or her consent or the consent of his or her relatives, when such sterilization is deemed advisable by the superintendent of such institution after an investigation has been made of all of the available history, circumstances, facts and symptoms of the case.

Section Three: — Whenever in the unanimous or majority opinion of a commission composed of the Chief Medical Officer of the Convict Department, or his delegated medical representative, the State Health Officer of Alabama, or his delegated medical representative, and the Superintendent of the Alabama Insane Hospitals, or his delegated representative from the medical staff of such hospitals, it may be conducive to the benefit of the physical, mental or moral condition of any sexual pervert, Sadist, homosexualist, Masochist, Sodomist, or any other grave form of sexual perversion, or any prisoner who has twice been convicted of rape, and who is lawfully confined in such State prison, to be sterilized, after the members of such commission have jointly examined into the particulars of the case, they may perform, or cause to be performed an operation for sterilization; provided, such operation shall not be performed until such commission has made report of the facts, with recommendation to the Governor of Alabama, that such operation be performed, and an order from the Governor permitting the performance of such operation has been obtained, a copy of such executive order shall be filed with the record of the case.

Section Four: — Before any convict lawfully committed to a State prison, who has been previously legally committed to any prison three times or more, or any recidivist, shall be dismissed or discharged from the custody of such prison, the Chief Medical Officer of the Convict Department shall carefully study all available family and personal history of said prisoner, and if there appears any ground for suspecting or believing that the case in question may be a repeating offender due to constitutional inferiority, mental or moral, or a constitutional moral degenerate, which tendency may be transmitted to his or her *545 progeny, such chief physician shall call in consultation the State Health Officer, or his delegated medical representative, and the Superintendent of the State Hospitals for Insane, or his delegated representative from the medical staff of said institutions, •who together with said Chief Physician of the Convict Department, shall constitute a commission of three to investigate all of the facts and history in the case, and be authorized by unanimous or majority opinion, to recommend to the Governor that such convict should be sterilized, and said commission shall be authorized to sterilize, or cause to be sterilized, such convict; provided, that such sterilization operation on such convict shall not be performed until and after the Governor has issued an order authorizing such sterilization, a copy of which order shall be filed with the record in such case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Opinion of the Justices
925 So. 2d 193 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2006)
In Re: Joseph Lee Moore
221 S.E.2d 307 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1976)
Wyatt v. Aderholt
368 F. Supp. 1382 (M.D. Alabama, 1973)
In Re the Sterilization of Hendrickson
123 P.2d 322 (Washington Supreme Court, 1942)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
162 So. 123, 230 Ala. 543, 1935 Ala. LEXIS 257, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-opinion-of-the-justices-ala-1935.