In Re Opinion of the Judges

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

In Re Opinion of the Judges

1929 OK CR 179, 277 P. 283, 43 Okla. Crim. 40, 1929 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 206

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedMay 11, 1929

DocketNo. A-7356.

StatusPublished

This text of 1929 OK CR 179 (In Re Opinion of the Judges) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Opinion of the Judges, 1929 OK CR 179, 277 P. 283, 43 Okla. Crim. 40, 1929 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 206 (Okla. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

*41 To His Excellency, the Governor of the State of Oklahoma — Sir:

In response to your official communication of April 26, 1929, addressed to this court, asking for an opinion as provided in section 2786, Comp. Stat. 1921, in the matter of the conviction of Claude (Blackie) Hager for the crime of murder in the district court of Ottawa county on February 18,1929, and by judgment of said court sentenced to death 'by electrocution on May 10, 1929, within the walls of the state penitentiary at McAlester, we hereby submit the following opinion of the judges:

EDWARDS, P. J.

The record submitted, and to which is attached your request for opinion, discloses that the defendant, Claude (Blackie) Hager, was charged with murder in the district court of Ottawa county. Upon a trial of said charge he was convicted, and sentence of death was rendered February 18, 1929. Under the Constitution and laws of this state, any person convicted of felony may appeal within six months from the time judgment is rendered. Section 2808, Comp. Stat. 1921. This time does not expire until August 18, 1929, but on April 30, 1929, defendant filed in this court his appeal from the judgment and sentence aforesaid. It has been the uniform holding of this court that the provisions of section 2786 of the statute contemplates an advisory opinion, where an appeal has not been taken from the judgment and sentence of death. To render an advisory opinion where an appeal has been perfected, and before the same has been briefed, argued, and submitted, would be to prejudge a case upon an ex parte proceeding.

*42 The appeal having been lodged in this court, such appeal automatically gave the accused a right to suspension of execution of the sentence of death until his appeal has been determined. An order staying execution has been made by this court, and the case will be duly reviewed on the appeal.

DAVENPORT and CHAPPELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*41 To His Excellency, the Governor of the State of Oklahoma — Sir:

In response to your official communication of April 26, 1929, addressed to this court, asking for an opinion as provided in section 2786, Comp. Stat. 1921, in the matter of the conviction of Claude (Blackie) Hager for the crime of murder in the district court of Ottawa county on February 18,1929, and by judgment of said court sentenced to death 'by electrocution on May 10, 1929, within the walls of the state penitentiary at McAlester, we hereby submit the following opinion of the judges:

EDWARDS, P. J.

The record submitted, and to which is attached your request for opinion, discloses that the defendant, Claude (Blackie) Hager, was charged with murder in the district court of Ottawa county. Upon a trial of said charge he was convicted, and sentence of death was rendered February 18, 1929. Under the Constitution and laws of this state, any person convicted of felony may appeal within six months from the time judgment is rendered. Section 2808, Comp. Stat. 1921. This time does not expire until August 18, 1929, but on April 30, 1929, defendant filed in this court his appeal from the judgment and sentence aforesaid. It has been the uniform holding of this court that the provisions of section 2786 of the statute contemplates an advisory opinion, where an appeal has not been taken from the judgment and sentence of death. To render an advisory opinion where an appeal has been perfected, and before the same has been briefed, argued, and submitted, would be to prejudge a case upon an ex parte proceeding.

*42 The appeal having been lodged in this court, such appeal automatically gave the accused a right to suspension of execution of the sentence of death until his appeal has been determined. An order staying execution has been made by this court, and the case will be duly reviewed on the appeal.

DAVENPORT and CHAPPELL, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1929 OK CR 179, 277 P. 283, 43 Okla. Crim. 40, 1929 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 206, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-opinion-of-the-judges-oklacrimapp-1929.