In re Opening of Pearl Street

5 A. 430, 111 Pa. 565, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 538
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 1, 1886·Published·Cited by 20 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the court was filed February 1st, 1886.

Per Curiam.

The evidence was sufficient to prove a dedication of the street to public use: Trutt v. Spotts, 87 Pa. St., 341; Transue v. Sell, 14 W. N. C., 397.

[572] To bold otherwise would enable the proprietor of a body of lands which he sells in lots to perpetrate a gross fraud. When he sells and conveys the lots according to a plan which shows them to be on streets, he must be held to have stamped upon them the character of public streets.

Not only can the purchasers of lots abutting thereon assert this character, but all others in the general plan may assert the same. The proprietor is in no condition to afterwards revoke this dedication.

It follows that there is no error in the conclusion at which the court arrived, nor in the decree which it made.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Opening of Pearl Street, 5 A. 430, 111 Pa. 565, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 538 (Pa. 1886).

5 A. 430 (In re Opening of Pearl Street) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hunsicker v. Katz
456 A.2d 576 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1983)
Snyder v. Commonwealth
46 A.2d 247 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1946)
City of St. Louis v. Clegg
233 S.W. 1 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1921)
Newell v. W. R. Case & Sons Cutlery Co.
60 Pa. Super. 166 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1915)
Jessop v. Kittanning Borough
74 A. 553 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1909)
Thorpe v. Clanton
85 P. 1061 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1906)
Weida v. Hanover Township
30 Pa. Super. 424 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1906)
Garvey v. Harbison-Walker Refractories Co.
62 A. 778 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1906)
South Western State Normal School's Case
62 A. 908 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1906)
South Western State Normal School
26 Pa. Super. 99 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1904)
Kerrigan v. Backus
74 N.Y.S. 906 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1902)
Richardson v. City of McKeesport
18 Pa. Super. 199 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1901)
Woodward v. City of Pittsburg
45 A. 91 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1899)
In re Estate of Rhoads
42 A. 116 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1899)
Higgins v. Borough of Sharon
5 Pa. Super. 92 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1897)
Quicksall v. City of Philadelphia
35 A. 609 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1896)
Herbert v. Rainey
54 F. 248 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania, 1892)
In re Opening of Brooklyn Street
12 A. 664 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1888)
In the Opening of Magnolia Avenue
11 A. 405 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1887)
Martinez v. Succession of Vives
32 La. Ann. 305 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1880)