In re Opening of Knox Street

12 Pa. Super. 534, 1900 Pa. Super. LEXIS 272
Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 16, 1900·No. Appeal, No. 157·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Opinion bt

.William W. Porter, J.,

This is an appeal from the order of the court below sustaining the exceptions to the report of a jury of view and setting aside the report. The question raised is whether the jury was regularly and lawfully continued, and its report filed in accordance with the law. The legislation involved in the decision of the case and the authorities bearing upon the subject have been carefully considered and reviewed at some length by the court below in an opinion by a judge of large experience and much learning in all matters relating to the road law of the state. We have given the case due consideration, and can find no reason to differ from the views expressed and the conclusion reached in the opinion filed. It therefore seems to us unnecessary to add further dissertation or discussion.

The judgment of the court below is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Opening of Knox Street, 12 Pa. Super. 534, 1900 Pa. Super. LEXIS 272 (Pa. Ct. App. 1900).

12 Pa. Super. 534 (In re Opening of Knox Street) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Road in North Whitehall & South Whitehall Townships
76 Pa. D. & C. 436 (Lehigh County Court of Quarter Sessions, 1951)
State-Aid Highway Application No. 1075, Easton to Tatamy
4 Pa. D. & C. 702 (Northampton County Court of Common Pleas, 1923)
In re Road in Manheim Township
80 Pa. Super. 581 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1923)
Harmer Township Road
40 Pa. Super. 287 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1909)
Umbria Street
32 Pa. Super. 333 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1907)
Upsal Street
22 Pa. Super. 150 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1903)