In re Opening of Knox Street

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

In re Opening of Knox Street

12 Pa. Super. 534, 1900 Pa. Super. LEXIS 272

CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedFebruary 16, 1900

DocketAppeal, No. 157

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 12 Pa. Super. 534 (In re Opening of Knox Street) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Opening of Knox Street, 12 Pa. Super. 534, 1900 Pa. Super. LEXIS 272 (Pa. Ct. App. 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion bt

.William W. Porter, J.,

This is an appeal from the order of the court below sustaining the exceptions to the report of a jury of view and setting aside the report. The question raised is whether the jury was regularly and lawfully continued, and its report filed in accordance with the law. The legislation involved in the decision of the case and the authorities bearing upon the subject have been carefully considered and reviewed at some length by the court below in an opinion by a judge of large experience and much learning in all matters relating to the road law of the state. We have given the case due consideration, and can find no reason to differ from the views expressed and the conclusion reached in the opinion filed. It therefore seems to us unnecessary to add further dissertation or discussion.

The judgment of the court below is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion bt

.William W. Porter, J.,

This is an appeal from the order of the court below sustaining the exceptions to the report of a jury of view and setting aside the report. The question raised is whether the jury was regularly and lawfully continued, and its report filed in accordance with the law. The legislation involved in the decision of the case and the authorities bearing upon the subject have been carefully considered and reviewed at some length by the court below in an opinion by a judge of large experience and much learning in all matters relating to the road law of the state. We have given the case due consideration, and can find no reason to differ from the views expressed and the conclusion reached in the opinion filed. It therefore seems to us unnecessary to add further dissertation or discussion.

The judgment of the court below is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 Pa. Super. 534, 1900 Pa. Super. LEXIS 272, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-opening-of-knox-street-pasuperct-1900.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack