in Re OOIDA Risk Retention Group, Inc., Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, and George Odom
This text of in Re OOIDA Risk Retention Group, Inc., Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, and George Odom (in Re OOIDA Risk Retention Group, Inc., Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, and George Odom) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
NO. 02-15-00238-CV
In re OOIDA Risk Retention Group, § Original Proceeding Inc., Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, and George Odom § From the 355th District Court
§ of Hood County (C2013333)
§ September 4, 2015
§ Opinion by Justice Gardner
JUDGMENT
This court has considered the petition for writ of mandamus filed by
Relators OOIDA Risk Retention Group, Inc., Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, and
George Odom. We conditionally grant the mandamus relief requested by
Relators in their first issue; direct the trial court to vacate its order denying
Relators’ motion to appoint an umpire; and direct the trial court to grant Relators’
motion and appoint an umpire in accordance with Condition 12 of the insurance
policy. All other relief requested by Relators in their petition is otherwise denied.
Writ will issue only if the trial court fails to comply.
It is ordered that real party in interest Ricky Lee Wells shall pay all costs of
this proceeding, for which let execution issue. SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS
By _/s/ Anne Gardner___________ Justice Anne Gardner
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re OOIDA Risk Retention Group, Inc., Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, and George Odom, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ooida-risk-retention-group-inc-certain-under-texapp-2015.