in Re O.O. and A.G.
Opinion
Opinion issued August 13, 2015
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
of Family and Protective Services. 1 See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221 (Vernon
2004); see also TEX. R. APP. P. 52 (governing original proceedings).
After considering the petition for writ of mandamus, the responses of the
real party in interest and attorney ad litem for A.G., and the relevant records, we
determine that relators have failed to establish entitlement to the extraordinary
relief of a writ of mandamus. Accordingly, we deny relators’ petition for writ of
mandamus and dismiss any pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Huddle, and Lloyd.
1 The underlying case is In the Interest of [A.G.], cause number 2015-02330J, pending in the 314th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Hon. John Phillips presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re O.O. and A.G. (in Re O.O. and A.G.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.