In re Onorevole

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Onorevole

784 A.2d 67, 170 N.J. 64, 2001 N.J. LEXIS 1394

DecidedNovember 16, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 784 A.2d 67 (In re Onorevole) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Onorevole, 784 A.2d 67, 170 N.J. 64, 2001 N.J. LEXIS 1394 (N.J. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 00-314 concluding that RICHARD M. ONOREVOLE of LAKE HIAWATHA, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1983, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect), RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.4 (failure to communicate with client) and RPC 8.4 (misrepresentation to client about status of matter), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that RICHARD M. ONOREVOLE is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 00-314 concluding that RICHARD M. ONOREVOLE of LAKE HIAWATHA, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1983, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect), RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.4 (failure to communicate with client) and RPC 8.4 (misrepresentation to client about status of matter), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that RICHARD M. ONOREVOLE is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

784 A.2d 67, 170 N.J. 64, 2001 N.J. LEXIS 1394, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-onorevole-nj-2001.