In re Onken

Oregon Supreme Court

In re Onken

54 P.3d 123, 334 Or. 599, 2002 Ore. LEXIS 666

CourtOregon Supreme Court

DecidedSeptember 26, 2002

DocketSC S47801

StatusPublished

This text of 54 P.3d 123 (In re Onken) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Onken, 54 P.3d 123, 334 Or. 599, 2002 Ore. LEXIS 666 (Or. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

In this contested reinstatement proceeding, the trial panel recommended that applicant be reinstated conditionally to the practice of law. Regarding whether to reinstate applicant, we agree with the reasoning and recommendation of the trial panel. Regarding whether to impose conditions on applicant’s reinstatement, we conclude that applicant only should be required to complete 45 hours of continuing legal education within one year of the date of this opinion.

Conditional reinstatement approved.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

In this contested reinstatement proceeding, the trial panel recommended that applicant be reinstated conditionally to the practice of law. Regarding whether to reinstate applicant, we agree with the reasoning and recommendation of the trial panel. Regarding whether to impose conditions on applicant’s reinstatement, we conclude that applicant only should be required to complete 45 hours of continuing legal education within one year of the date of this opinion.

Conditional reinstatement approved.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 P.3d 123, 334 Or. 599, 2002 Ore. LEXIS 666, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-onken-or-2002.