In re O'Neill

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re O'Neill

257 A.D. 1072, 14 N.Y.S.2d 620, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9118

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 11, 1939

StatusPublished

This text of 257 A.D. 1072 (In re O'Neill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re O'Neill, 257 A.D. 1072, 14 N.Y.S.2d 620, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9118 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

The parties having agreed in open court that this appeal may be decided by a court of four justices, the decision is as follows: Order denying application to restrain the board of elections of the city of New York from printing the name of Albert D. Sehanzer as a candidate for justice of the Municipal Court, Eighth Municipal District, Borough of Brooklyn, City of New York, upon the official ballots to be used for the election of persons to party positions in the Democratic party at the primary election to be held on the 19th day of September, 1939, and to invalidate and declare null and void the designating petitions heretofore filed on behalf of such candidate, affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The parties having agreed in open court that this appeal may be decided by a court of four justices, the decision is as follows: Order denying application to restrain the board of elections of the city of New York from printing the name of Albert D. Sehanzer as a candidate for justice of the Municipal Court, Eighth Municipal District, Borough of Brooklyn, City of New York, upon the official ballots to be used for the election of persons to party positions in the Democratic party at the primary election to be held on the 19th day of September, 1939, and to invalidate and declare null and void the designating petitions heretofore filed on behalf of such candidate, affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

257 A.D. 1072, 14 N.Y.S.2d 620, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9118, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-oneill-nyappdiv-1939.