In re One of the Two Trustees of the Peekamose Fishing Club

5 A.D. 283, 39 N.Y.S. 124
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1896·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Ingraham, J.:

The appeal from these two orders must be dismissed. The original’ order entered on the twenty-sixth day of October, appears to have been resettled, and that order was consequently vacated by the order resettling it. By the order as resettled it appears that appellant Whiton was in default. The appellant Dimock applied for an adjournment, which was refused, whereupon his counsel withdrew, and the order as resettled contained a recital that no one appeared on behalf of the respondent Whiton, and the motion was then decided after hearing David McClure, Esq., of counsel for the petitioner, and on. that motion the order was entered. This was evidently an order [284] granted on default, and from an order entered on default no appeal can be taken. (§ 1294 of the Code.) This appeal is, therefore, dismissed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Barrett, Rumsey and Williams, JJ., concurred.

Appeal from orders dismissed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re One of the Two Trustees of the Peekamose Fishing Club, 5 A.D. 283, 39 N.Y.S. 124 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1896).

5 A.D. 283 (In re One of the Two Trustees of the Peekamose Fishing Club) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Feist v. Weingarten Bros.
111 N.Y.S. 848 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1908)
Koeppel v. Koeppel
48 Misc. 358 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1905)
Forgotson v. Becker
39 Misc. 813 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1903)