In re One Hundred & Twenty-Seventh Street
56 N.Y. St. Rep. 884
This text of 56 N.Y. St. Rep. 884 (In re One Hundred & Twenty-Seventh Street) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
In re One Hundred & Twenty-Seventh Street, 56 N.Y. St. Rep. 884 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).
Opinion
The record upon which this appeal is heard shows beyond dispute that the relation of attorney and client between Deering and James Baird never existed ; and as that relation is the necessary foundation for an attorney’s lien, it follows that the attorney .has no lien upon the fund. The order should be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
56 N.Y. St. Rep. 884, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-one-hundred-twenty-seventh-street-nysupct-1893.