In re Omar W.
This text of 57 A.D.3d 447 (In re Omar W.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the court’s determinations concerning credibility. The credible evidence disproved defendant’s justification defense beyond a reasonable doubt. Concur — Tom, J.P., Friedman, Gonzalez, McGuire and Acosta, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
57 A.D.3d 447, 869 N.Y.2d 339, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-omar-w-nyappdiv-2008.