In Re Omar Elizondo, Ovidio Elizondo, and Dr. Anthony Cynthia Elizondo Aradillas v. the State of Texas

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-26-00236-CV

IN RE Omar ELIZONDO, Ovidio Elizondo, and Dr. Anthony Cynthia Elizondo Aradillas

Original Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Irene Rios, Justice Adrian A. Spears II, Justice

Delivered and Filed: April 15, 2026

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED; EMERGENCY MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RELIEF DENIED AS MOOT; MOTION FOR EXPEDITED CONSIDERATION DENIED AS MOOT

Relators filed their petition for writ of mandamus, emergency motion for temporary relief,

and motion for expedited consideration on March 24, 2026. Having considered the petition and

motions, we have determined that relators have not established that they are entitled to the relief

requested. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. The

emergency motion for temporary relief and the motion for expedited consideration are denied as

moot.

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 12,620, styled Omar Elizondo v. Hilcorp Energy Company, pending in the 49th Judicial District Court, Zapata County, Texas, the Honorable Walden Shelton presiding.