In Re Omar Elizondo, Ovidio Elizondo, and Cynthia Elizondo Aradillas v. the State of Texas

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)·Decided July 31, 2026·No. 04-26-00583-CV·Published

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-26-00583-CV

IN RE Omar ELIZONDO, Ovidio Elizondo, and Cynthia Elizondo Aradillas, Relators

Original Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Irene Rios, Justice

Lori Massey Brissette, Justice

Delivered and Filed: July 31, 2026

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED; EMERGENCY MOTIONS FOR TEMPORARY RELIEF DENIED AS MOOT

On July 28, 2026, relators Omar Elizondo, Ovidio Elizondo, and Cynthia Elizondo Aradillas filed a petition for writ of mandamus and motion for temporary relief. Relators have since filed additional motions for temporary relief. After considering relators’ petition and the mandamus record, we conclude relators are not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, relators’ petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). Relators’ motions for temporary relief are denied as moot.

PER CURIAM

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 12,620 styled Omar Elizondo, Ovidio Elizondo, and Cynthia Elizondo Aradillas v. Hilcorp Energy Company and Predecessors, Eva Linda Paredes, and The Law Offices of Donato Ramos, PLLC, pending in the 49th Judicial District Court, Zapata County, Texas, the Honorable Jack W. Marr presiding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Omar Elizondo, Ovidio Elizondo, and Cynthia Elizondo Aradillas v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2026).

In Re Omar Elizondo, Ovidio Elizondo, and Cynthia Elizondo Aradillas v. the State of Texas (In Re Omar Elizondo, Ovidio Elizondo, and Cynthia Elizondo Aradillas v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.