In re Olivo

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Olivo

915 A.2d 489, 189 N.J. 304, 2007 N.J. LEXIS 9

DecidedJanuary 11, 2007

StatusPublished

This text of 915 A.2d 489 (In re Olivo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Olivo, 915 A.2d 489, 189 N.J. 304, 2007 N.J. LEXIS 9 (N.J. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 06-212, concluding that FRANK G. OLIVO of HAMMONTON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1979, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.5(b) (failure to communicate the basis or rate of a fee in writing) and RPC 1.9(a)(1) (conflict of interest), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that FRANK G. OLIVO is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 06-212, concluding that FRANK G. OLIVO of HAMMONTON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1979, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.5(b) (failure to communicate the basis or rate of a fee in writing) and RPC 1.9(a)(1) (conflict of interest), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that FRANK G. OLIVO is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

915 A.2d 489, 189 N.J. 304, 2007 N.J. LEXIS 9, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-olivo-nj-2007.