In Re Oliveira Florinda Marlon v. the State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 14, 2024
Docket14-23-00809-CV
StatusPublished

This text of In Re Oliveira Florinda Marlon v. the State of Texas (In Re Oliveira Florinda Marlon v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Oliveira Florinda Marlon v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 14, 2024.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-23-00809-CV

IN RE OLIVEIRA FLORINDA MARLON, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS County Court at Law No. 1 Waller County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 19-01-25338

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On October 25, 2023, relator Oliveira Florinda Marlon filed a “writ of mandamus.” See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks the court to reopen In re Marriage of Nanette Yvette Marlon and Oliveira Florinda Marlon (14-19-00610-CV). We dismissed that appeal, as the filing fee was not paid. Tex. R. App. P. 5, 42.3(c). This court has the authority to issue writs of mandamus against a judge of a district, statutory county, statutory probate county, or county court in the court of appeals district and all writs necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221(a), (b). This purported petition for a writ of mandamus is not directed at any of the judges listed above, and we have no subject-matter jurisdiction to proceed. Even were we to treat this a motion in the former appeal, our plenary power over our December 17, 2019 judgment in case number 14-19-00610-CV expired 60 days after judgment as there was no timely filed motion for rehearing or en banc reconsideration, or timely filed motion to extend time to file such a motion. Tex. R. App. P. 19.1. We dismiss this proceeding for want of subject-matter jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Zimmerer, Spain, and Hassan.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
In Re Oliveira Florinda Marlon v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-oliveira-florinda-marlon-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.