In re Oliphant

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Oliphant

99 So. 3d 30, 2012 WL 4856293, 2012 La. LEXIS 2692

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedOctober 12, 2012

DocketNo. 2012-B-1973

StatusPublished

This text of 99 So. 3d 30 (In re Oliphant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Oliphant, 99 So. 3d 30, 2012 WL 4856293, 2012 La. LEXIS 2692 (La. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.

*

_JjThe Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent notarized a document outside the presence of the signatory. Prior to the institution of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline, in which the parties stipulated that respondent engaged in the alleged misconduct. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Scott E. Oliphant, Louisiana Bar Roll number 23885, be and he hereby is publicly reprimanded.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

Chief Justice Kimball not participating in the opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI