In re Olah

Ohio Supreme Court

In re Olah

739 N.E.2d 816, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1491, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 3191

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 20, 2000

Docket00-1968

StatusPublished

This text of 739 N.E.2d 816 (In re Olah) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Olah, 739 N.E.2d 816, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1491, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 3191 (Ohio 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

Lorain App. No. 99CA007318. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists; the parties are to brief the issue stated in the court of appeals’ Journal Entry filed October 5, 2000, at page 2:

“Whether the language of R.C. 2151.35(B)(1) requires a juvenile court to dismiss a complaint without prejudice on its own motion when «the court cannot hold the dispositional hearing within ninety [1492]*1492days of the filing of the complaint.”

F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent.

The conflict cases are In re Kutzli (1991), 71 Ohio App.3d 843, 595 N.E.2d 1026; In re Bailey (Apr. 17, 1998), Lucas App. No. L-96-363, unreported, 1998 WL 196287; and In re N.B. (Apr. 15, 1996), Butler App. Nos. CA95-02-031, CA95-03-056 and CA95-06-017, unreported, 1996 WL 174546.

Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 00-1785, In re Olah, Lorain App. No. 99CA007318.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI