In re O'Keefe

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re O'Keefe

814 So. 2d 1288, 2002 La. LEXIS 1399, 2002 WL 731819

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided April 24, 2002·No. No. 2001-B-1643·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

Considering the Petition for Consent Discipline filed by respondent, Michael H. O’Keefe, and the concurrence therein filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for consent discipline be and hereby is rejected.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the case be remanded to the hearing committee for consideration of the previously-filed formal charges. Upon remand, the hearing committee and disciplinary board may consider recommendation of the sanction of permanent disbarment, if appropriate, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, §§ 10(a) and 24, as amended effective August 1, 2001.

/s/ Chet D. Traylor

Justice, Supreme Court of Louisiana

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Considering the Petition for Consent Discipline filed by respondent, Michael H. O’Keefe, and the concurrence therein filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for consent discipline be and hereby is rejected.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the case be remanded to the hearing committee for consideration of the previously-filed formal charges. Upon remand, the hearing committee and disciplinary board may consider recommendation of the sanction of permanent disbarment, if appropriate, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, §§ 10(a) and 24, as amended effective August 1, 2001.

/s/ Chet D. Traylor

Justice, Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re O'Keefe, 814 So. 2d 1288, 2002 La. LEXIS 1399, 2002 WL 731819 (La. 2002).

Pincite

814 So. 2d 1288 (In re O'Keefe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related