In re Ohio Criminal Sentencing Statutes Cases

110 Ohio St. 3d 264
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided September 13, 2006·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

{¶ 1} The following dispositions of currently pending appeals are hereby entered based on our decision in State v. Foster, 109 Ohio St.3d 1, 2006-Ohio-856, 845 N.E.2d 470.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur.

{¶ 2} The discretionary appeal is accepted in the following case on the proposition of law noted, the judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for resentencing:

{¶ 3} 2005-2385. State v. Copeland, Butler App. No. CA2003-12-320, 2005-Ohio-5899, 2005 WL 2937282. Accepted on Proposition of Law No. VIII.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Ohio Criminal Sentencing Statutes Cases, 110 Ohio St. 3d 264 (Ohio 2006).

110 Ohio St. 3d 264 (In re Ohio Criminal Sentencing Statutes Cases) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Copeland v. Shoop
S.D. Ohio, 2022
State v. Mahone
2014 Ohio 1251 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2014)
State v. Copeland, Ca2007-02-039 (11-19-2007)
2007 Ohio 6168 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2007)
State v. Payne
873 N.E.2d 306 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2007)