In re O'Hearn
92 A.D.2d 925, 460 N.Y.S.2d 739, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17333
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re O'Hearn. Read the opinion of the Court — 89 A.D.2d 184 →
Opinion
Motion by respondent for reargument of this court’s determination, dated October 18,1982, suspending respondent from the practice of law for a period of one year, effective November 15, 1982; or for other relief. The suspension was stayed on November 12, 1982. Motion for reargument granted. Upon reargument, the penalty imposed upon the respondent is reduced to a public censure. The Per Curiam, opinion and order both dated October 18, 1982 [89 AD2d 184] are amended accordingly. Mollen, P. J., Titone, Lazer, Mangano and Rubin, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re O'Hearn, 92 A.D.2d 925, 460 N.Y.S.2d 739, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17333 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).
92 A.D.2d 925 (In re O'Hearn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re O'Hearn
89 A.D.2d 184 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)