In re O'Hara

789 A.2d 644, 170 N.J. 397, 2002 N.J. LEXIS 30
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided January 30, 2002·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Office of Attorney Ethics having filed a petition with the Supreme Court pursuant to Rule 1:20 — 3(g) and Rule 1:20-11(a), seeking the immediate temporary suspension from practice of DANIEL J. O’HARA, JR., formerly of SUMMIT, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1971, good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that DANIEL J. O’HARA, JR., is temporarily suspended from the practice of law, effective immediately, and until further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that no petition for reinstatement be submitted until respondent has provided a complete accounting for the Dolan estate demonstrating that he has properly safeguarded the estate funds and assets; and it is further

ORDERED that all funds, if any, currently existing in any New Jersey financial institution maintained by respondent.pursuant to Rule 1:21-6 or in connection with the Estate of John F. Dolan, shall be restrained from disbursement except on application to this Court, for good cause shown, pending the further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that DANIEL J. O’HARA, JR., be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension and that he comply with Rule 1:20-20 dealing with suspended attorneys.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re O'Hara, 789 A.2d 644, 170 N.J. 397, 2002 N.J. LEXIS 30 (N.J. 2002).

789 A.2d 644 (In re O'Hara) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.