In re Ogilvie

186 A.3d 1242
CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 21, 2018
DocketNo. 16–BG–1094
StatusPublished

This text of 186 A.3d 1242 (In re Ogilvie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Ogilvie, 186 A.3d 1242 (D.C. 2018).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

On consideration of the certified order of the Court of Appeals of Maryland disbarring respondent from the practice of law in that jurisdiction, this court's April 25, 2018, order that lifted a previously imposed stay of the proceedings and directed respondent to show cause why reciprocal discipline should not be imposed, and the statement of Bar Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline, and it appearing that respondent filed the required D.C. Bar R. XI § 14 (g) affidavit on January 24, 2017, but failed to file a response to this court's order to show cause, it is

ORDERED that Claire L.K.K. Ogilvie is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the District of Columbia nunc pro tunc to January 24, 2017. See In re Sibley , 990 A.2d 483 (D.C. 2010), and In re Fuller , 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C. 2007) (rebuttable presumption of identical reciprocal discipline applies to all cases in which the respondent does not participate).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Sibley
990 A.2d 483 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2010)
In Re Fuller
930 A.2d 194 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
186 A.3d 1242, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ogilvie-dc-2018.