In re Official Ballot for the General Election of November, 1906

109 N.W. 1, 99 Minn. 517, 1906 Minn. LEXIS 481
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedOctober 12, 1906
DocketNo. 15,063
StatusPublished
Cited by16 cases

This text of 109 N.W. 1 (In re Official Ballot for the General Election of November, 1906) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Official Ballot for the General Election of November, 1906, 109 N.W. 1, 99 Minn. 517, 1906 Minn. LEXIS 481 (Mich. 1906).

Opinion

PEE CURIAM.

This matter came on for hearing on an order requiring the respondents to show cause why the name of John W. Johnson, which has been placed upon the sample official ballot for the next general election as, the candidate for governor of the Socialist-Labor Party, should not be stricken from such sample ballot, and that his name be wholly omitted from the official ballot. Upon the admissions and proofs of the parties the court finds that the electors’ certificate of .nomination of John W. Johnson, which was filed in the office of the secretary of state and made the basis for placing his name on the sample ballot as such candidate, was signed by less than two thousand qualified voters of the state, and that it was therefore legally insufficient to entitle his name to be placed on the official ballots for any purpose. It is therefore ordered that the name of John W. Johnson be stricken from the sample ballot, and that the respondent Peter E. Hanson, as secretary of state, refrain from placing the name of John W. Johnson on any of such official ballots.

Let a copy of this order be delivered to such secretary without unnecessary delay.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Troutman v. Facetglas, Inc.
316 S.E.2d 424 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1984)
Longbine v. Johnson
347 S.W.2d 772 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1961)
Millsap v. National Funding Corp.
135 P.2d 407 (California Court of Appeal, 1943)
Doyen v. Bauer
300 N.W. 451 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1941)
Zochrison v. Redemption Gold Corp.
274 N.W. 536 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1937)
Osborn v. Will
236 N.W. 197 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1931)
Kirby v. Dean
199 N.W. 174 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1924)
Schultz v. Spicer
191 N.W. 423 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1923)
United States Installment Realty Co. v. DeLancy Co.
188 N.W. 212 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1922)
Blosick v. Warmbold
187 N.W. 136 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1922)
Snyder v. Samuelson
167 N.W. 287 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1918)
State v. Brooks-Scanlon Lumber Co.
142 N.W. 717 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1913)
State ex rel. Miller v. Harmon
35 Nev. 189 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1912)
O'Connor v. Smithers
45 Colo. 23 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1908)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
109 N.W. 1, 99 Minn. 517, 1906 Minn. LEXIS 481, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-official-ballot-for-the-general-election-of-november-1906-minn-1906.