In re Office of Information Practices Opinion Letter No. F16-01
This text of In re Office of Information Practices Opinion Letter No. F16-01 (In re Office of Information Practices Opinion Letter No. F16-01) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 27-SEP-2019 09:52 AM
SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII ________________________________________________________________
IN RE OFFICE OF INFORMATION PRACTICES OPINION LETTER NO. F16-01 ________________________________________________________________
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; S.P. NO. 15-1-0097(1))
ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
Petitioner/Petitioner-Appellant James R. Smith’s application for writ of certiorari filed on July 29, 2019, is hereby accepted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that no oral argument will be heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawaiʻi Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument. DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, September 27, 2019. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In re Office of Information Practices Opinion Letter No. F16-01, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-office-of-information-practices-opinion-letter-no-f16-01-haw-2019.