In re of Reif

168 N.E.2d 838, 8 N.Y.2d 927, 204 N.Y.S.2d 167, 1960 N.Y. LEXIS 1150
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 10, 1960
StatusPublished

This text of 168 N.E.2d 838 (In re of Reif) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re of Reif, 168 N.E.2d 838, 8 N.Y.2d 927, 204 N.Y.S.2d 167, 1960 N.Y. LEXIS 1150 (N.Y. 1960).

Opinion

Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld and Burke. Judges Froessel, Van Voorhis and Foster dissent and vote to reverse and to grant the relief demanded upon the ground that operating a home is not a “ trade or business ” and that the Legislature specifically excluded from the unemployment insurance tax ‘ compensation paid in any medium other than cash to an employee for service not in the course of the employer’s trade or business ” (L. 1951, ch. 829; L. 1952, ch. 496). The statute containing this exclusion was enacted later than the general statute, its language is perfectly clear, and, in our opinion, the statutory exclusion controls.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
168 N.E.2d 838, 8 N.Y.2d 927, 204 N.Y.S.2d 167, 1960 N.Y. LEXIS 1150, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-of-reif-ny-1960.