In re of Proving the Last Will & Testament of Maginn

215 A.D. 790
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 15, 1925·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Order of the Surrogate’s Court of Richmond county reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. The surrogate of the county of Kings once having acquired and exercised jurisdiction, and not having determined the residence of the testatrix not to have been in her own county, excluded the subsequent exercise of jurisdiction by the surrogate of the county of Richmond. (Surrogate’s Court Act, § 44; Matter of Buckley, 41 Hun, 106.) Kelly, P. J., Rich, Jaycox, Manning and Young, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re of Proving the Last Will & Testament of Maginn, 215 A.D. 790 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1925).

215 A.D. 790 (In re of Proving the Last Will & Testament of Maginn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Estate of Hurd
17 Misc. 2d 513 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1959)
In re the Probate of the Will of Rosenberg
14 Misc. 2d 933 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1958)
In re the Probate of the Will Edwards
187 Misc. 139 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1946)
In re the Estate of Mills
171 Misc. 42 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1939)
In re the Estate of Feinberg
155 Misc. 844 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1935)
In re the Estate of Humpfner
146 Misc. 461 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1933)
In re the Estate of Daniels
140 Misc. 89 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1931)