In re of Fifteenth Ave. Extension
This text of 54 Cal. 604 (In re of Fifteenth Ave. Extension) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The transcript not having been filed within the time prescribed by Rule 2 of this Court, the appeal must be dismissed. So ordered.
10,406.—PEOPLE v. CRAWFORD.
5,983.—‘KELLY v. MORGAN.
5,928.—SHAY v. LADY BRYAN MINING CO.
6,269.—WATERMAN et al. v. LIPMAN et al.
6,551.—COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO v. OAKS.
Judgment affirmed in the above cases, for default of appearance on the part of appellants.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
54 Cal. 604, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-of-fifteenth-ave-extension-cal-1880.