In re of Bauguess
This text of 196 N.C. 278 (In re of Bauguess) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
C. S., 2591, in regard to reopening sales on advance bids, wben real estate is sold under mortgages or deeds of trust, etc., is interpreted in In re Ware, 187 N. C., 693, and cases cited. See, also, Trust Co. v. Powell, 189 N. C., 372; Newby v. Gallop, 193 N. C., 244; Cherry v. Gilliam, 195 N. C., 233.
In Cherry v. Gilliam, supra, at p. 234, it was said that C. S., 2591, “confers no power on the clerk to make any orders unless the bid is increased.”
The plaintiff’s remedy was by an action. The motion is dismissed.
Error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
196 N.C. 278, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-of-bauguess-nc-1928.