In re of Bauguess

196 N.C. 278
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided November 21, 1928·Published

Opinion

ClaRksoN, J.

C. S., 2591, in regard to reopening sales on advance bids, wben real estate is sold under mortgages or deeds of trust, etc., is interpreted in In re Ware, 187 N. C., 693, and cases cited. See, also, Trust Co. v. Powell, 189 N. C., 372; Newby v. Gallop, 193 N. C., 244; Cherry v. Gilliam, 195 N. C., 233.

In Cherry v. Gilliam, supra, at p. 234, it was said that C. S., 2591, “confers no power on the clerk to make any orders unless the bid is increased.”

The plaintiff’s remedy was by an action. The motion is dismissed.

Error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re of Bauguess, 196 N.C. 278 (N.C. 1928).

196 N.C. 278 (In re of Bauguess) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Virginia Trust Co. v. Powell
127 S.E. 242 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1925)
Newby v. . Gallop
136 S.E. 610 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1927)
Cherry v. . Gilliam
141 S.E. 594 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1928)
In Re Mortgage Sale of Ware Property
122 S.E. 660 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1924)