In re Odyssey Transportation, LLC

62 A.D.3d 1175, 881 N.Y.S.2d 504
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 21, 2009
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 62 A.D.3d 1175 (In re Odyssey Transportation, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Odyssey Transportation, LLC, 62 A.D.3d 1175, 881 N.Y.S.2d 504 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 2, 2007, which ruled that Odyssey Transportation, LLC was liable for unemployment insurance contributions on remuneration paid to certain drivers.

Odyssey Transportation, LLC operates a limousine transportation service that works through franchise agreements with its drivers. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board found that an employment relationship existed between Odyssey and the drivers and assessed it additional unemployment insurance contributions in the amount of $71,262.12. Odyssey appeals.

The record demonstrates that Odyssey assigns jobs to the drivers and requires them to display a company sign and adhere to a dress code. Odyssey sets the rates that clients are charged and handles billing, collections and customer complaints. Drivers are required to submit vouchers each week, are paid 80% to 83% of the fares they collect, are reimbursed for tolls and are paid by Odyssey regardless of whether the client has paid. Drivers are prohibited from working for another ground transportation company and may not use substitute drivers for assign[1176]*1176ments. Given similar facts, we have consistently held that the Board’s determination finding that drivers were employees was supported by substantial evidence, despite the existence of evidence which might support a contrary conclusion (see Matter of Automotive Serv. Sys., Inc. [Commissioner of Labor], 56 AD3d 854, 855-856 [2008]; Matter of Spectacular Limo Link, Inc. [Commissioner of Labor], 21 AD3d 1172, 1173 [2005]; Matter of De Paiva [Olympic Limousine—Commissioner of Labor], 270 AD2d 534, 534-535 [2000]).

Peters, J.P., Lahtinen, Kane, Kavanagh and Garry, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Escoffery (Park W. Exec. Servs. Inc.--Commissioner of Labor)
2020 NY Slip Op 1422 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
Matter of Aleksanian (Corporate Transp. Group, Ltd.--Commissioner of Labor)
2020 NY Slip Op 1428 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
Matter of Jung Yen Tsai (XYZ Two Way Radio Serv., Inc.--Commissioner of Labor)
2018 NY Slip Op 7807 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Matter of Baez (Commr. of Labor)
143 A.D.3d 1190 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
In re Khan
66 A.D.3d 1098 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
62 A.D.3d 1175, 881 N.Y.S.2d 504, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-odyssey-transportation-llc-nyappdiv-2009.