In re Odinkemere

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In re Odinkemere

880 A.2d 1232

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedAugust 25, 2005

DocketNo. 1019 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

StatusPublished

This text of 880 A.2d 1232 (In re Odinkemere) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Odinkemere, 880 A.2d 1232 (Pa. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 25th day of August, 2005, E. Nkem Odinkemere having been disbarred from the practice of law in the State of New Jersey by Order of the Supreme Court of New Jersey dated January 19, 2005; the said E. Nkem Odinkemere having been directed on May 13, 2005, to inform this Court of any claim he has that the imposition of the identical or comparable discipline in this Commonwealth would be unwarranted and the reasons therefor; and upon consideration of the responses [1233]*1233filed, the request for oral argument and/or further proceedings is denied and it is

ORDERED that E. Nkem Odinkemere is disbarred from the practice of law in this Commonwealth, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa. R.D.E.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 25th day of August, 2005, E. Nkem Odinkemere having been disbarred from the practice of law in the State of New Jersey by Order of the Supreme Court of New Jersey dated January 19, 2005; the said E. Nkem Odinkemere having been directed on May 13, 2005, to inform this Court of any claim he has that the imposition of the identical or comparable discipline in this Commonwealth would be unwarranted and the reasons therefor; and upon consideration of the responses [1233]*1233filed, the request for oral argument and/or further proceedings is denied and it is

ORDERED that E. Nkem Odinkemere is disbarred from the practice of law in this Commonwealth, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa. R.D.E.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

880 A.2d 1232, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-odinkemere-pa-2005.