In re O'Connor

78 S.W.3d 458, 2001 Tex. App. LEXIS 6708, 2001 WL 1168838
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 4, 2001
DocketNo. 01-01-00877-CV
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 78 S.W.3d 458 (In re O'Connor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re O'Connor, 78 S.W.3d 458, 2001 Tex. App. LEXIS 6708, 2001 WL 1168838 (Tex. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Relator, Lisa Black O’Connor, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus complaining that Judge Michel1 is constitutionally disqualified from sitting in the underlying case. According to the petition for writ of mandamus and motion for emergency relief, the underlying case has already been tried to a jury, a judgment has been signed, a motion for new trial has been filed, and a hearing on the motion for new trial is set for October 12, 2001. The motion to disqualify Judge Michel, the order of referral pursuant to Tex.R. Civ. P. 18a(d), and the order denying the motion to disqualify Judge Michel were all filed or signed after the judgment was signed.

We deny the petition for writ of mandamus and the motion for emergency relief.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re O'Connor
92 S.W.3d 446 (Texas Supreme Court, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
78 S.W.3d 458, 2001 Tex. App. LEXIS 6708, 2001 WL 1168838, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-oconnor-texapp-2001.